The Analysis of Discourse Markers in Science Debate

  • Erka Indah Sari Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Keywords: Discourse Markers, Science Debate, Argument

Abstract

This study investigated discourse markers that occurred in the science debate by TJump and Nathan Thompson. This research aimed to determine the types of discourse markers that TJump and Nathan Thompson used and described their functions. The researcher used a descriptive-qualitative approach to answer research questions by using Schiffrin's theory (1987). The data was taken from utterances containing discourse markers from TJump and Nathan Thompson's debate that discusses globe vs. flat Earth. This research reveals that there were six types of discourse markers and 11 discourse markers, which have different functions, such as a marker of information management (oh); a marker of response (well); discourse connectives (and, but, or); markers of cause and result (so, because); markers of temporal adverbs (now, then); markers of information and participation (I know, I mean). The function of those discourse markers are a marker of information management to attract attention, a marker of response to create coherence, discourse connectives to connect more units, to mark contrasting units as option markers, a marker of cause and result as a complement, and subordinate ideas, markers of temporal adverbs are to show the relationship between time, markers of information and participation are as the transition of information state and indicate the speaker's orientation. The next researcher can use another theory to analyze discourse markers, especially discourse markers as fillers. This study focused only on the types and functions of discourse markers; the researcher can connect discourse markers to speech acts and use different theories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aijmer, K. (2015). Analyzing Discourse Markers in Spoken Corpora: Actually as a Case Study. In Corpora and discourse studies (pp. 88-109). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Amalia, R. M., Citraresmana, E., & Saefullah, N. H. (2021). Discourse markers in diplomatic setting: Ministerial dialogue between Australia and Indonesia. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 346-359.

Arya, T. (2020). Exploring Discourse Marker Use in Thai University Students' Conversations. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(1), 247-267.

Banguis-Bantawig, R. (2019). The role of discourse markers in the speeches of selected Asian Presidents. Heliyon, 5(3), e01298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01298

Damopolii, V. L. F. (2021). Agreement and Disagreement Function in Discourse Marker Well in Debate Night America Program: A Pragmatic Analysis. Jurnal Kata: Penelitian tentang Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(1), 149-160.

Esther, K. N. (2020). Forms and Functions of English Discourse Markers among Secondary School Students’ debating Discourse in Makueni County (Doctoral Dissertation, Kenyatta University).

Guo, Y. (2018, May). An Analysis on Discourse Markers in First 2016 U.S. Presidential Debate. In 2018 4th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2018) (pp. 453-457). Atlantis Press.

Hasniar. (2017). Discourse markers used in brad bird’s movie “tomorrowland.” 40300113051.

Huang, L. F. (2019). A Corpus-Based Exploration of the Discourse Marker Well in Spoken Interlanguage. Language and Speech, 62(3), 570–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918798863

Maschler, Y., & Schiffrin, D. (2015). Discourse markers language, meaning, and context. The Handbook of discourse analysis, 189-221.

Nasution, S., Gurning, B., & Tangkas, I. (2018). The Discourse Markers in President Joko Widodo's KTT APEC China 2015 speeches. In Proceeding AISTEEL The First Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (Vol. 3, pp. 249-253). Universitas Negeri Medan.

Pratiwi, L. R., Basthomi, Y., Yannuar, N., Hidayati, M., Pratiwi, R., Basthomi, Y., Yannuar, N., & Hidayati, M. (2020). " You Know " As A Discourse Marker In English Learners ' Spoken Discourse : UM-SpEAKs. 17(7), 6974–6994.

Rofiq, Z., & Priyono, E. S. (2021). Discourse Markers of Humor Analysis in Trevor Noah’s Stand-Up Comedy. Lingual: Journal of Language and Culture, 11(1), 14-14.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers (No. 5). Cambridge University Press.

Schiffrin, D. (2005). Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. The Handbook of discourse analysis, 54-75.

Sembiring, E. A. (2017). Discourse Markers in Presidential Debate Between Donald John Trump and Hillary Clinton (Doctoral dissertation, UNIMED).

Ussolichah, A. N., Indra, A., Rahayu, H. D., & Wulansari, A. (2021). Discourse Marker Analysis in Avengers: Endgame Movie. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 5(2), 94-112.

Vrieze, S. D. (2020). The Use and Effect of Coherence Markers in Presidential Debates.

Zheng, W. (2019). m o in Longxi Polyfunction derived from fillers : The case of l a Qiang. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.009

PlumX Metrics

Published
2023-07-24
How to Cite
Sari, E. (2023). The Analysis of Discourse Markers in Science Debate. Journal of Literature, Linguistics, & Cultural Studies, 2(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.18860/lilics.v2i1.2755