Tahliil al'Ahaadiith al-Zaaifah fi Khitaab al-Wataniyyah wa' Akhlaaqiyyaat al-'Amal bi al-Fadha' al-Raqamy

  • Abdullah Ubaid Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Nasrulloh Nasrulloh Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Muh. Faruq Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Al Lastu Nurul Fatim Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Azzah Saniyyah Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Keywords: Arabic Language; Digital Religious Authority; Pseudo-Hadith; Social Media; Symbolic Authority.

Abstract

This study examines the role of Arabic as a form of symbolic authority in the construction of pseudo-religious authority through the dissemination of pseudo-hadith within narratives of nationalism and work ethics in digital spaces. The study employed a qualitative approach using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) combined with takhrij al-hadith methods. The data consisted of digital religious content containing Arabic quotations collected from Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube. Data were analyzed through text identification, hadith verification, and discourse interpretation. The findings reveal that Arabic possesses strong symbolic capital due to its association with the Qur’an, hadith, and the Islamic scholarly tradition, enabling it to generate religious legitimacy for messages circulated in digital media. Pseudo-hadith are utilized as instruments of symbolic legitimation to reinforce narratives of religious nationalism and Islamic work ethics, despite lacking authentic hadith status. Furthermore, social media contributes to the reproduction of religious authority through digital popularity, algorithmic visibility, and symbolic representation. This study concludes that the acceptance of pseudo-hadith in digital spaces is shaped not only by textual validity but also by the symbolic power of Arabic and the logic of digital information distribution that constructs contemporary religious legitimacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulrahman, M. A. (2024). Cultural and Social Influences on Hadith Classification: An Analytical Study of Historical Transformations. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 2783–2791. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4926

Ahmad, K., Ariffin, M. F. M., & Nasir, M. K. M. (2022). The Modern Bogus Hadith and Its Form in Current Reality. AlBayan, 20(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340121

Al Shlowiy, A. S. (2022). Language, religion, and communication: The case of Islam and Arabic in the Asia-Pacific. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 32(2), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00040.shl

Andok, M. (2024). The Impact of Online Media on Religious Authority. Religions, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091103

Arifianto, M. L., Aminah, S., Izzudin, I. F., Mujahidah, Z. A., Muthmainnah, F., & Rahma, H. L. (2025). The Influence of Arabic in Malang: Exploring the Role of Linguistic Landscapes in Shaping Religious and Cultural Identity. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies, 20(2), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v20i02/91-114

bin Alhadri, A. L., & bin Ramle, M. R. (2018). A critical analysis of prophetic narrations mentioned in KAFA JAKIM’s’Aqīdah textbooks. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2018(Special Issue 6), 1264–1271. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi6.1264.1271

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Polity Press. https://monoskop.org/images/4/43/Bourdieu_Pierre_Language_and_Symbolic_Power_1991.pdf

Boutz, J., Brugman, C., & Lancaster, A. (2017). Quoting the prophet online: Communicative functions of hadith quotations in web based Arabic discourse. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 10(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.10.1.3_1

Cader, A. A. (2016). Towards an Islamic model of work motivation. Intellectual Discourse, 24(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v24i1.750

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DLbBDQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false

Dang, P. M. T., Nguyen, D. T., Bui, H. T., & Nguyen, T. T. (2024). THE ROLE OF BUDDHISM IN THE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF VIETNAM: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.24857/RGSA.V18N6-061

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://coehuman.uodiyala.edu.iq/uploads/Coehuman library pdf/English libraryكتب الانكليزي/linguistics/Critical Discourse Analysis The Critical Study of Language (.pdf

Fauzi, M. L., Mustofa, I., Maliki, I. A., & Husaini, F. (2026). The Digital Minbar: Repositioning Religious Authority and the Dynamics of Islamic Law in Contemporary Egypt’s Virtual Landscape. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 5(1), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.11109

Firmansyah, K. R., & Lhaksmana, K. M. (2025). Classification of Hadith Authenticity Using ArabicBERT. 2025 International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications, ICoDSA 2025, 1003–1008. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoDSA67155.2025.11157495

Hjelm, T. (2014). Religion, Discourse and Power: A Contribution towards a Critical Sociology of Religion. Critical Sociology, 40(6), 855–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513477664

Laugu, N., Arianto, M. S., & Mustafa, A. (2024). Correlative Effects Between Digital Literacy and Religious Authority Among Academic Communities in Indonesia. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 9(1), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2024.1.142

Lohlker, R., & Wahid, S. H. (2026). The Transformation of Islamic Religious Authority. Religions, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17040493

Lohlker, R., Wahid, S. H., Abdulrahman, M. A., Wahid, S. H., Abdulloh, S., Daoudi, O., Qudsy, S. Z., Abdullah, I., Pabbajah, M., Brown, J. A. C., Arifianto, M. L., Aminah, S., Izzudin, I. F., Mujahidah, Z. A., Muthmainnah, F., Rahma, H. L., Ahmad, K., Ariffin, M. F. M., Nasir, M. K. M., … Shamsi, M. I. (2026). The Future of Hadith Studies in The Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges. European Journal of Social Sciences, 20(1), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-7644/2026/v7n1a14

Luthfi, E. T., Suryana, N., & Basari, A. H. (2018). Digital hadith authentication: A literature review and analysis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(15), 5054–5068. http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol96No15/25Vol96No15.pdf

Nordin, M. Z. F. (2026). ARABIC LANGUAGE IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF LANGUAGE AND RELIGION IN MALAYSIA, 1981–2022. Kajian Malaysia, 44(1), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2026.44.1.11

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Qudsy, S. Z., Abdullah, I., & Pabbajah, M. (2021). The Superficial Religious Understanding in Hadith Memes: Mediatization of Hadith in the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 20(60), 92–114. https://thenewjsri.ro/index.php/njsri/article/view/104/41

Refaee, E. A. (2022). Detecting Hadith Authenticity Using a Deep-learning Approach. Scientific Journal of King Faisal University Basic and Applied Sciences, 23(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.37575/b/sci/210084

Riani, R., Setiyanto, E., Rahim, H. F., Musayyedah, M., Indra, J., Ratnawati, R., Sumadi, S., Rahayu, R., & Purnami, W. H. (2025). Exploring the relationship between the eighteen character values in Indonesian National identity and East Borneo folklore. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2559517

Saeed, A. (2011). Authority in Qur’ānic interpretation and interpretive communities. In Communicating the Word: Revelation, Translation, and Interpretation in Christianity and Islam (pp. 115–123). Georgetown University Press. https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/scholarlywork/346722-authority-in-qur%27ānic-interpretation-and-interpretive-communities

Supriyadi, T., Julia, J., Aeni, A. N., & Sumarna, E. (2020). Action research in hadith literacy: A reflection of hadith learning in the digital age. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.6

Thompson, J. B. (1991). Editor’s Introduction. In Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. https://monoskop.org/images/4/43/Bourdieu_Pierre_Language_and_Symbolic_Power_1991.pdf

Wahyuningsih, S. (2019). The hadith digitization in millennial era: A study at center for hadith studies, Indonesia. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 7(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v7i1.4900

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284725923_Methods_of_Critical_Discourse_Studies_3rd_edition

PlumX Metrics

Published
2026-06-26
How to Cite
Ubaid, A., Nasrulloh, N., Faruq, M., Fatim, A. L., & Saniyyah, A. (2026). Tahliil al’Ahaadiith al-Zaaifah fi Khitaab al-Wataniyyah wa’ Akhlaaqiyyaat al-’Amal bi al-Fadha’ al-Raqamy. MLIJo: Journal of Law and Islamic Thought, 1(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.18860/mlijo.v1i2.32349
Section
Articles