PEMBLOKIRAN ASET DAN AKSES DATA PRIBADI BERBASIS ELEKTRONIK TANPA IZIN PENGADILAN PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH

Authors

  • Inayatur Rohmaniya UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Imam Sukadi Universitas Islam Negri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18860/mlijo.v1i3.32954

Keywords:

Asset Blocking, Data Privacy, New Criminal Procedure Code, Siyasah Dusturiyah

Abstract

The rapid development of cyber technology requires reform of Indonesia’s criminal procedure law to address cybercrime effectively. Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (New Criminal Procedure Code) expands investigators’ coercive powers, including blocking cyber assets and accessing electronic data in urgent situations without prior court approval. This study aims to analyze the legality and implications of these digital coercive measures and examine them from the perspective of Siyasah Dusturiyah (Islamic constitutional law). This study employs a qualitative descriptive normative legal method by examining the New Criminal Procedure Code and classical and contemporary siyasah fiqh literature. The findings indicate that the urgent situation clause, based largely on investigators’ subjective assessment, may create risks of abuse of power, undermine due process of law, and threaten constitutional rights to privacy and property. From the perspective of Siyasah Dusturiyah, granting extensive executive authority without independent judicial oversight may encourage arbitrary action and conflict with the principle that public authority must be exercised for the benefit of society (tasharruf al-imam ‘ala al-ra‘iyyah manuthun bi al-maslahah). Therefore, this study proposes strengthening judicial oversight through a rapid electronic court authorization system (e-permission), inspired by the supervisory function historically associated with Wilayat al-Mazalim, to ensure accountability and substantive justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ade Rizki Saputra. (2023). Aspects of Personal Data Protection According to International Law. Formosa Journal of Social Sciences (FJSS), 2(3), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjss.v2i3.6192

Ahwan, N. R. (2025). Coercive Measures in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code: Perspectives From the Criminal Justice System Model. Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, 10(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v10i2.274

Akmal, M. D., Maimun, M., & Karini, E. (2025). Implementasi Konsep Keadilan Fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah dalam Praktik Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, 4(2), 964–970. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58738/qanun.v4i2.1111

Ardiansyah, M. I., Marwiyah, S., Taufik, M., & Prawesthi, W. (2026). Penerapan Digital Evidence Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Les Genralis, 7(7), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v7i7.4713

Ardiyan Syah Abdi Negara, A. L. (2025). Ibn khaldun. JIIC: Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2, 10061–10067. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jiic/article/view/3559

Baderin, M. A. (2010). Hukum Internasional Hak Asasi Manusia & Hukum Islam. Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia. https://www.komnasham.go.id/files/20161021-hukum-internasional-hak-asasi--$VK9YT4B.pdf

Cahyaningsih, J., Nurva, Y. P. A., Setyawan, F., & Adonara, F. F. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Nasabah atas Pemblokiran Rekening oleh Bank Secara Sepihak (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 112/Pdt.G/2022/PN Yyk). Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 5(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v5i2.3027

Certa, L. (2026). Kejelasan Rumusan Delik Pasal 454 KUHP: Analisis Berdasarkan Prinsip Lex Certa. Andi Fathurrahman*1, Muhammad Fathir Al Farisi2, Fajar Bakti Tolanda’3, 4(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51903/4p79h797

Dimas Amanda Pebri Saputra, A. N. dan M. I. (2026). A Review Of Siyasah Dusturiyah On The Open Proportional System (An Analytical Study Of Law Number 7 Of 2017 Concerning General Elections). Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 7(2), 1–10. https://www.ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/3348

Firhansyah, M., Jalaluddin, H., & Khasyi, N. (2026). Reposisi Fungsi Ombudsman dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional : Studi Komparatif Dialektis dengan Lembaga Wilayatul Mazhalim di Era Kontemporer. JURAGAN: Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Dan Penelitian, (April 2025), 5142–5163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62710/etfjsy65

Juan Daud Putra Siahaan, I. G. N. N. K. Y. (2025). Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Crime Control Model (CCM) Dan Due Process Model (DPM) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.62281

Kartika, R. W., Nasser, M., & Suswantoro, T. A. (2025). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Perlindungan Privasi Pasien dalam Era Digital: Studi Kasus Aplikasi Satu Sehat. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.5874

Kurniawan, R. D., & Wicaksono, B. P. (2026). Transformasi Kejahatan Digital dan Tantangan Penegakan Hukum dalam Era Kecerdasan Buatan dan Big Data. Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 4(2), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.51903/c6gm4503

Lailatul Munawaroh, Muhammad Irsad, E. P. (2025). Konsep Al-Musāwāh dalam Al-Qur’an: Interpretasi Hermeneutika Jorge J.E. Gracia. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 4(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v4i2.363

Lestari, E. F., & Aruan, D. C. (2026). Problematika Pembuktian Digital dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Siber di Indonesia. Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, 5(April), 178–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v5i2.6623

Mufty, A. M. (2026). Paradigma Baru Pembuktian Pidana Berbasis Teknologi dalam KUHAP Baru dan Implikasinya terhadap Standar Fair Trial di Indonesia. Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 702–718. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v6i2.11076

Muklis Al’Anama, Lolita Fitriyanaa, L. A. Z. (2025). Unlawful Acts of Governance : Characteristics and Limits of Discretion. Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Goverment, 2, 78–90. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/ijalgov/article/view/45781

Negara, D. S., & Rafi, M. (2025). Validity Of Search And Seizure In Pre-Trial Proceedings: Reconstruction Of Authority Using The Plain View Doctrine. Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(7), 1–26. https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/1244/791

Putriyana, A., & Yulian, Y. (2026). Transformasi Proses Penyidikan Oleh Kepolisian Berdasarkan Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 26(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2026.V26.109-126

Rahmi, A., & , Muhammad Nur Syahbani, A. T. N. U. P. (2025). Ketiadaan Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan dalam RUU KUHAP 2025 : Ancaman Judicial Scrutiny dan Perlindungan HAM. Jurnal Hukum Pidana Indonesia, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.67468/jhpi.v2i1.27

Ramayanti, R., Nuha, M. L., & Antasari, R. (2026). Konsep Negara Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence,Economic and Legal Theory, 4(1), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v4i1.1763

Rinaldo, M. E., Pradikta, H. Y., Syariah, F., Raden, U. I. N., & Lampung, I. (2021). Analisis Fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Tentang Trading in Influence dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. AS-SIYASI: Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v1i1.8955

Rindu Ulul Ilmi Sugianto, Rizki Mustika Trijayanti, Muhammad Fadin Ramadhan, M. Z. (2025). Fiqh Siyasah : Tugas Pemimpin Dalam Islam. Jurnal Studi Islam Indonesia ( JSII ), 3(1), 161–176.

Saefullah, A. S. (2024). Ragam Penelitian Kualitatif Berbasis Kepustakaan Pada Studi Agama dan Keberagamaan dalam Islam Agus Susilo Saefullah. Al-Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 2(4), 195–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59059/al-tarbiyah.v2i4.1428

Setyawan, V. P. (2025). Hukum di Era Digital : Efisiensi atau Kehilangan Esensi dalam Proses Peradilan. Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, 7(02), 10–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31849/1rpvs876

Shofiyah, R., Samuji, S., Yulianis, M. S. F., Murniati, D., & Abdul Majid, A. B. (2024). Principles of Fiqh Siyasah in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 11(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v11i1.50225

Suaib. (2025). Kedudukan Dan Dinamika Fiqh Siyasah Dalam Sistem Hukum Islam Modern the Position and Dynamics of Fiqh Siyasah in the Modern Islamic Legal System. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(3), 4395–4404.

Supriyadi, A. P. (2024). Dekonstruksi Hukum Social Commerce Indonesia: Perspektif Demokrasi Ekonomi di Era Digitalisasi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 24(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2024.V24.229-246

Sutrsino., A. (2025). Peran Hakim dalam Mewujudkan Due Process of Law Pada Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Locus : Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 5. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jkih/article/view/434/260

Ulfatul Ilmiyah, S. (2025). Formulasi Agama Dan Negara Dalam Wacana Politik: Telaah Kritis Gagasan Ibnu Khaldun Dan Hans Kelsen. Qanun: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Tata Negara, 1(1), 49–77.

UU RI No 20 Tahun 2025, BPK RI (2025).

Weruin, U. U. (2017). Logic, Reasoning and Legal Argumentation. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1427

Wibowo, K. T., & Sunaryanto, H. (2026). Intervensi Kekuasaan Eksekutif Dalam Peradilan Pidana : Tantangan Terhadap Independensi Kekuasaan Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 12(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v12i1.4824

Yacob, C. Y. (2022). Problematika Penerapan Pasal 28 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik 1Christovel. Jurnal Hukum Legalita, 6(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47637/legalita.v6i2.1413

Yudianto, R. A., & Imaniyanti, N. S. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Nasabah Atas Pemblokiran Rekening Oleh Ppatk. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 6(1), 391–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsls.v6i1.21847

Zamroni, M., Rahmanita, R. A., Esa, A., Zahra, A., & Hasana, F. W. (2026). Analisis Kaidah Tasharruf Al- Imam ‘ Ala Al- Ra ’ iyyah Manuthun Bil Maslahah dalam Perspektif Qowaidh Fiqh Siyasah. Tadhkirah: Jurnal Terapan Hukum Islam Dan Kajian Filsafat Syariah, 3(April), 01–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59841/tadhkirah.v3i2.489

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Rohmaniya, I., & Sukadi, I. (2026). PEMBLOKIRAN ASET DAN AKSES DATA PRIBADI BERBASIS ELEKTRONIK TANPA IZIN PENGADILAN PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH. MLIJo: Journal of Law and Islamic Thought, 1(3), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.18860/mlijo.v1i3.32954

Issue

Section

Articles