Implementation of Progressive Law in Post-Divorce Alimony Rights in Obscuur Libel Verdict (Case Study of Decision No. 2276/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Bgl)
Abstract
The case that occurred at the Bangil Religious Court with Number: 2276/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Bgl. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff sued cumulatively with the support of the wife after the divorce and child support. However, the Panel of Judges rejected all lawsuits about alimony rights filed by the plaintiff against the defendant and only granted the divorce lawsuit because of the lawsuit about obscuur libel alimony rights. The analysis used using the perspective of progressive law Sajtipto Rahardjo is related to justice in deciding divorce cases with the right to support the wife and children after the divorce which was rejected on the grounds of the obscuur libel lawsuit. The purpose of this study is to analyze and describe how the decision Number: 2276/Pdt.G/2023/PA. Bgl whether it is in accordance with positive law in Indonesia and uses the perspective of Prarogresive Law of Satjipto Rahardjo. The result of this investigation is that the verdict is not in line with the positive law and the progressive law of Satjipto Rahardjo. In deciding a case, it is not only based on dogma-normatives but also must consider justice and conscience in decideing. The decision does not meet the elements in the perspective of Satjipto Rahardjo's Progressive Law, namely flexibility, social justice, human rights, and change. This can be seen from the decision which only looks at the formal aspect of the lawsuit, does not give the rights that should be given to the wife and children, does not provide justice to the victim, and does not provide a change for the better after the case is decided.
Downloads
References
Agung Ketut Bagus Wira Adi Putra, I Gusti, Ida Ayu Putu Widiati, dan Ni Made Puspasutari uj. “Gugatan Tidak Dapat Diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) dalam Gugatan Cerai Gugat di Pengadilan Agama Badung.” 2020-10-28, Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, Vol 1, no. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum (t.t.). https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.1.2.2565.305-309.
Ali, Mahrus. Membumikan Hukum Progresif. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo, 2013.
Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi. “Karakteristik Dasar dan Urgensi Pemikiran Hukum Progresif dalam Konteks Penegakan Hukum.” Widyasrama 22, no. 2 (13 Maret 2017). http://ejournal.undwi.ac.id/index.php/widyasrama/article/view/48.
Anshary. Hukum Acara Perdata Pengadilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syar‟iyah. Bandung: Redaksi Mandar Maju, 2017.
Hamzah, Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas, dan Usep Saepullah. “HAK-HAK PEREMPUAN PASCA PERCERAIAN DALAM HUKUM POSITIF DAN HUKUM ISLAM.” 2022, Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, Vol. 6 (t.t.). https://doi.org/10.19109/ujhki.v6i1.12239.
Harahap, Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Cet. 14. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, t.t.
Maiyestati. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sumbar: LPPM Universitas Bung Hatta, 2022.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
Nuryadi, Deni. “Teori hukum Progresif Dan Penerapannya di Indonesia,” De’Jure: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, Vol 1, no. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum (2016). https://doi.org/10.35706/dejure.v1i2.515.
Permata Damarsari, Bening, Widhi Handoko, dan Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja. “Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Hukum Progresif Terhadap Pandangan Hakim Pada Hak Anak Hasil Poligami Tanpa Izin.” 2021, Notarus, Vol. 14 (t.t.). https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i1.38862.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif. Bantul: Genta Publishing, 2009.
———. Ilmu Hukum. VIII. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
———. Membedah hukum Progresif. Jakarta: PT. Kompas Media Nusantara, 2006.
Rofiq, Ahmad. Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 1998.
Santoso, Agus. Hukum, Moral, dan Keadilan: Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
Simanjuntak, P.N.H. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.
Solikin, Nur. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Pasuruan: CV Penerbit Qiara Media, 2021.
Sutiyoso, Bambang. Metode Penemuan Hukum. Kedua. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2007.
Yana, Lutfi, dan Ali Trigiyatno. “Pemenuhan Hak Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian.” 30 Oktober 2022, AlHukkam, Volume 2, no. Journal Of Islamic Family Law (2022).
Zulkarnaen, dan Dewi Mayaningsih. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama di Indonesia. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia, 2017.
Imamah, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Gugatan Obscuur libel dalam Perkara Gugat Waris dan Pembatalan Wasiat” (Analisis Putusan Perkara Nomor 1515/Pdt.G/2012/PA.JS, Nomor 47/Pdt.G/2013/PTA.JK dan Nomor 673 K/Ag/2013)”, (Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2019)
Ahad Ridho Hadianto, “Hak Nafkah anak Setelah Perceraian Perspektif Hukum Islam (Studi Putusan Nomor 4221/Pdt.G/2018/PA.JS dan Nomor 4140/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JS).”, (Skripsi: Universitas Islam Negri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, 2023)
Imamah, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Gugatan Obscuur libel dalam Perkara Gugat Waris dan Pembatalan Wasiat” (Analisis Putusan Perkara Nomor 1515/Pdt.G/2012/PA.JS, Nomor 47/Pdt.G/2013/PTA.JK dan Nomor 673 K/Ag/2013)”, (Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2019)
