Justice Brokers: Examining Women’s Rights in the Polygamy Process in Gorontalo City
Abstract
The protection of women’s rights in the process of polygamy in Gorontalo City is a crucial issue that requires careful examination to emphasize the fundamental objectives of Islamic law. Legal protection represents an important manifestation of Islamic law’s goals in realizing justice, public welfare, and the protection of individual rights, particularly those of women. In this context, attention is directed to the preventive role of the Religious Court as well as the potential negligence of justice intermediaries (justice brokers) in prioritizing the protection of women’s rights, which can be analyzed through the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. Using the maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah framework, this study evaluates whether polygamous practices in Gorontalo City fulfill the objectives of Islamic law, including the protection of religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn), life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), intellect (ḥifẓ al-‘aql), lineage (ḥifẓ al-nasl), and property (ḥifẓ al-māl). The findings indicate that several challenges remain in both regulatory structures and practical implementation, particularly regarding weak verification mechanisms, unequal power relations within families, and the limited role of justice brokers in ensuring that women’s rights are fully considered during the legal process. From the perspective of justice theory proposed by John Rawls, the protection of women’s rights requires fairness in access to information and equal bargaining positions in decision-making. When the first wife lacks adequate information or experiences pressure to consent to polygamy, the process fails to meet the principle of justice as fairness. Therefore, strengthening the role of the Religious Court, improving oversight of justice brokers, and ensuring transparency in legal information are essential steps toward protecting women’s rights and achieving justice in polygamous practices.
Downloads
References
Abdul Latif Rizqon, Muhamad Kharis Tambusai, Nurul Dwi Hastuti, and Ahmad Agus Hidayat. “Analysis of Human Resource Management Towards Improving Employee Performance Maqhasid Sharia Review.” Finansia : Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Perbankan Syariah 6, no. 2 (2023): 195–210. https://doi.org/10.32332/finansia.v6i2.7788.
Adi Rianto. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Dan Hukum. Granit, 2004.
Adiyanta, F. C. Susila. “Hukum Dan Studi Penelitian Empiris: Penggunaan Metode Survey Sebagai Instrumen Penelitian Hukum Empiris.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2, no. 4 (2019): 697–709. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i4.697-709.
Al-Syatibi, I. A. I. (2006). Al-Muwafaqat: Rozatun Min Ilmi Ushul al-Syari’ah (F. Al-Salami, Ed.). Dar Ibnul Qayyim. n.d.
Analiansyah, Analiansyah, Dhiaurrahmah Dhiaurrahmah, Jamhuri Jamhuri, Abdul Jalil Salam, and Mizaj Iskandar. “Polygamy and Women’s Rights: An Examination of Divorce Litigation in Sharia Court Rulings Pertaining to Revisions in Indonesian Matrimonial Legislation.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 9, no. 2 (2024): 761–86. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i2.10833.
Arif, Alfiyah Faizatul. “Assessing Couples’ Readiness and Child’s Best Interests: A Comparative Analysis of Mojokerto Religious Court Decisions on Marriage Dispensation.” Al-Hukama’: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law 15, no. 1 (2025): 36–67. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.1.36-67.
Arsyad, Azman, Mahmuddin Daud, and Aisyah Idris. “Religious Moderation, Pela Gandong and Jihad Reconstruction: Conflict Prevention in Maluku from the Perspective of Maqāṣid Al-Sharī’ah.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (2025): 394–415. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9i1.26416.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT. n.d.
Bianca J Smith and Mark Woodward(Edit.). . Gender and Power in Indonesian Islam: Leaders, Feminists, Sufis and Pesantren Selves. Routledge, 2014.
Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., & Raley, S. B. “The Shifting Importance of Education for Family Formation in the United States.” Population and Development Review 46, no. 3 (2020): 465–93.
Budimansyah, Budimansyah, and Syarifah Arabiyah. “Keabsahan Status Hukum Perkawinan Poligami tanpa Izin Pengadilan Agama.” Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti 2, no. 2 (2018): 107–18.
Dainori, Dainori. “Maslahah Sebagai Teori Penetapan Hukum: Telaah Atas Konsep Maslahah Ibnu Qayyim Al-Jauziyah.” Nizham Journal of Islamic Studies 8, no. 01 (2020): 39. https://doi.org/10.32332/nizham.v8i01.2092.
Damis, Rahmi, Andi Nurbaethy, Aisyah Arsyad, Ajidar Matsyah, and Fakhruddin Lahmuddin. “Gender, Sufism, and Qur’anic Exegesis: Perceptions of Women’s Leadership within Sufi Orders in South Sulawesi.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (2025): 83–106. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9i1.26145.
Farhat Munir and Muhammad Aboidullah. Gender Differences in Transformational Leadership Behaviors of School Principals and Teachers’ Academic Effectiveness. 2018. Bulletin of Education and Research.
Fatimawali, Fatimawali, Zainal Abidin, and Gani Jumat. “Teori Maqashid Al-Syari’ah Modern: Perspektif Jasser Auda.” Prosiding Kajian Islam Dan Integrasi Ilmu Di Era Society (KIIIES) 5.0 3, no. 1 (2024): 232–37.
Hikmah, Nurul, and Agung Ary Subagya. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Perempuan Terkait Praktik Poligami Siri Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Lentera : Journal of Gender and Children Studies 2, no. 1 (2020): 35–54. https://doi.org/10.26740/lentera.v2i1.9039.
Irianto, Sulistyowati. “Inheritance Legal Pluralism and Gender Justice: A Court Room Study in Indonesia.” Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis 56, no. 3 (2024): 459–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2024.2379738.
Jannah, Siti Raudhatul, and Yuyun Wahyu Izzati. Resistance of Poligamous Women. n.d.
Justice broker. Interview Results. Gorontalo, Agustus 2024.
“Justice Brokers: Women’s Experiences with Injustice and Dependence in the Divorce Process.” Accessed January 18, 2024. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/23311886.2021.1966208?needAccess=true.
Mahmudah, Nurul, Muammar Muammar, and Lailatul Muthoharoh. “GENDER IN FIQH PERSPECTIVE.” SETARA: Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak 1, no. 02 (2019): 02.
Munandar, Arism and Endang Susanti. “Negosiasi Identitas Gender Dalam Arena Politik Hukum Islam: Studi Kasus RUU Ketahanan Keluarga Dan Respons Ormas Islam: Studi Kasus RUU Ketahanan Keluarga Dan Respons Ormas Islam.” Al Fuadiy Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 6, no. 2 (2024): 81–101. https://doi.org/10.55606/af.v6i2.1293.
Mustamam, Danialsyah, Nurasiah Harahap, Mega Arum Saputri, and Lutter Ariestino. “Reinterpreting Ḥifẓ Al-Nasl in Contemporary Marriage Contracts: Navigating Islamic Normativity and State Law.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 2 (2025): 1258–80. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11158.
Pengadilan Agama Negeri Kota Gorontalo. Interview Results. Agustus 2024.
Santoso, Lukman, Arij Amaliyah, and Miftahul Huda. “Refusal of Polygamy Permit in Religious Court Decision.” Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 23, no. 2 (2023): 160–73. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v23i2.1472.
Wardatun, Atun, Jan A. Ali, Linda Firdawaty, and Maghfurrohmah Maghfurrohmah. “Family Dynamics and Social Cohesion in the Intermarriage of Indonesian Muslims in Australia: Revalidating Ibnu Khaldun’s Theory of Asabiyyah.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 9, no. 2 (2025): 778–802. https://doi.org/10.22373/dbj7dm60.
