Perbandingan kritik Ushul Nahwu
Pemikiran Tamam Hasan dan Ibrāhīm Muṣṭafā
Abstract
Nahwu science, a field that studies Arabic grammar, has attracted attention of observers and scholars of Arabic language from classical to modern times. Since Abu Aswad ad-Duali's era, the field has experienced a significant development and has become an important basis for understanding Arabic in depth. Classical studies that are philosophical and logical, such as those of Imam Sibawaih, have provided an epistemological basis for the development of nahwu science. In an effort to understand the significant differences in their perspectives, this article compares and analyzes the thoughts of these two figures. Tamam Hasan criticized several aspects of nahwu from the point of view of dialect, epochal theory, history, and the method of proof. Sebaliknya, Ibrāhīm Muṣṭafā presented a fundamental criticism of the inconsistency of the meaning of classical nahwu with modern studies, especially in the concept of I'rab. Therefore, Ibrāhīm Muṣṭafā and Tamam have their own way of thinking.
Downloads
References
Abdurradi, Ahmad Muhammad. Ihya’ an-Nahwi wa al-Waqi al-Lughawi, Dirasah Tahliliyyah Nqdiyyah. Kairo: Dār al-Ma’ārif.
Afandi, Zamzam. (2003). Ilmu Nahwu: Prinsip-Prinsip dan Upaya Pembaharuannya (Kajian Epistemologis). Jurnal Adabiyyat, 2(1).
Alfala, A., & Sopian, A. (2024). Simplifikasi I’rab Nahwu Imam Sibawaih Perspektif Nahwu Modern Ibrahim Mustafa; Simplification of I’rab Nahwu Imam Sibawaih According to Perspective of Ibrahim Mustafa’s Modern Nahwu. Loghat Arabi: Jurnal Bahasa Arab Dan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36915/la.v5i1.93
Al-Ghalibi, Isom Kazim. (2011). Kitab Ihya’ An-Nahwi li Al-Ustadz Ibrahim Mustafa: Tahlil wa Naqd.
Hazuar. (2019). Konsep I’rab Dalam Pandangan Ibrahim Musthafa dan Ibrahim Anis. Arabiyatuna : Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 3(1), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v3i1.796
Holilulloh, A. (2020). Kontribusi Pemikiran Nahwu Imam Sibawaih dan Ibrahim Mushtafa dalam Linguistik Arab. In AlLFAZ (Arabic Literatures for Academic Zealots) (Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 35–56). https://doi.org/10.32678/alfaz.vol8.iss1.2448
Margadinata, W. (n.d.). Metode Penelitian Nahwu Tamam Hasan (Issue 14750010, pp. 1–15).
Roji, F. (2024). Nahwu Concept According to Imam Sibawaih and Ibrahim Mustafa in Arabic Linguistics (Comparative Studies of Syntax). Mantiqu Tayr: Journal of Arabic Language, 4(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.21043/arabia.v6i1.1393
Susiawati, W. (2017). Ushul Al-Nahwi Dalam Perspektif Ibnu Madha. Arabi: Journal of Arabic Studies, 2(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.24865/ajas.v2i2.55
Tammam, Asep M. (2009). Upaya Individual Pembaruan Ilmu Nahwu XX. Bandung: UIN Sunan Gunung Djati.
Umamawati, Rena (2016) Min Naqd Ibrahim Musthafa Fi Ba'd Al Masaail Al Nahwiyah Fi Kitabihi Ihya Al Nahwi. Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
Zikri, M. (2011). Tajdid Al-Nahwi Fi Kitab Ihya'al-Nahwi Li-Ibrahim Musthofa Dirasah Washfiyah (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta).
Copyright (c) 2024 Sayyidatul Muflihah, Uswatul Qodriyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
