Analisis kritis kasus etika bisnis
Menggabungkan rasionalitas dan hati nurani
Abstract
This article, titled "Critical Analysis of Business Ethics Cases: Combining Rationality and Conscience," explores the essential integration of rational decision-making and moral conscience in the realm of business ethics. It emphasizes that while rationality often drives systematic and profit-oriented decision-making, it must be balanced with an understanding of conscience, which serves as a moral guide in complex ethical situations. The discussion highlights the significance of conscience in fostering sustainability practices, as evidenced by Gajanayake et al., who assert that ethical motivations are fundamental to managerial decision-making. Furthermore, the dynamic nature of conscience encourages reflective practices that uphold moral integrity, particularly in challenging environments. The limitations of the rational choice model are critiqued, suggesting that a more holistic approach that incorporates both rationality and conscience is necessary for a comprehensive understanding of ethical behavior in business. Additionally, the article underscores the practical implications of integrating ethical considerations into organizational culture, emphasizing the importance of supporting individuals in making conscientious decisions. Ultimately, this critical analysis reveals the intricate interplay between rationality and conscience, advocating for a more responsible and sustainable approach to business ethics.
Downloads
References
-, M. K. (2023). The Role of Case Studies in Teaching Business Ethics: A Literature Review. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i04.5476
Bernacchio, C. (2019). Pope Francis on Conscience, Gradualness, and Discernment: Adapting Amoris Laetitia for Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29(04), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2019.15
Dziubaniuk, O. (2016). ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF R&D ORGANIZATIONS: NETWORKING BUSINESS AND SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.20472/bmc.2016.003.008
Fioravante, R. (2024). Beyond the Business Case for Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Strategic CSR in Light of Digital Washing and the Moral Human Argument. Sustainability, 16(3), 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031232
Gajanayake, A., Ho, O. T., & Iyer‐Raniga, U. (2023). Motivations and Drivers for Adopting Sustainability and Circular Business Strategies in Businesses in Victoria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2559
Gheraia, Z., Saadaoui, S., & Abdelli, H. A. (2019). Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility: Bridging the Concepts. Open Journal of Business and Management, 07(04), 2020–2029. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2019.74139
Hampshire, K., Mariwah, S., Amoako-Sakyi, D., & Hamill, H. (2022). “It Is Very Difficult in This Business if You Want to Have a Good Conscience”: Pharmaceutical Governance and on-the-Ground Ethical Labour in Ghana. Global Bioethics, 33(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2022.2103899
Jodaki, K., Cheraghi, M. A., & Mazaheri, M. (2023). Striving to Keep a Clear Conscience by Going Above and Beyond. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 46(2), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/cnq.0000000000000452
Jodaki, K., Cheraghi, M. A., Pashaeypoor, S., & Hoseini, A. S. S. (2021). Clarifying the Concept of Conscience in Nurses’ Ethical Performance in Iran: a Concept Analysis Study. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v14i14.7669
Martin, K., & Parmar, B. L. (2011). Assumptions in Decision Making Scholarship: Implications for Business Ethics Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0965-z
Rhodes, C. (2017). Ethical Praxis and the Business Case for LGBT Diversity: Political Insights From Judith Butler and Emmanuel Levinas. Gender Work and Organization, 24(5), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12168
Copyright (c) 2024 Angelia Triyana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
