Analisis kewenangan pengadilan tata usaha negara (studi putusan ptun jakarta nomor. 604/g/2023/ptun jkt)
Abstract
The State Administrative Court (PTUN) has an important role in overseeing and assessing the validity of decisions issued by state administrative bodies or officials. The authority possessed by the PTUN is crucial especially in cases involving public rights, where state administrative decisions have the potential to affect the lives of many people. This research aims to analyze the authority possessed by the State Administrative Court, especially in deciding case No. 604/g/2023/ptun. 604/G/2023/PTUN JKT. The results of this study show that the State Administrative Court has the authority to cancel or justify a state administrative decision that is proven to violate the law or unfairly harm certain parties. In case number 604/G/2023/PTUN JKT, the panel of judges decided that the decision challenged by the plaintiff met the requirements to be annulled because there was evidence that the decision was taken without regard to legal procedures or had unfairly violated the plaintiff's rights.
Downloads
References
Alifian, M., Fauzi, G., & Erliyana, A. (2023). Kompetensi Mengadili Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Oleh Badan Dan/Atau Pejabat Pemerintahan (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad). UNES Law Review, 6(2), 4357–4371. https://review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/1273
Amalia, Y. S., & Umam, K. (2021). Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 006/PUU-II/2004 Perspektif Siyāsah Dusturiyāh. Al-Balad: Journal of Constitutional Law, 3(3).
Anita Firdaus, A. K. (2016). PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA TENTANG PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG PRESPEKTIF SIYASAH QODHA’IYAH. 4(30), 1–23.
Azzahrawi, A., Djalil, H., & Idami, Z. (2019). Wewenang Dan Kendala Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Kepegawaian Setelah Upaya Administratif. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 3(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v3i2.12189
Guntur, S. (2021). Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Mengadili Sengketa Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah Dan Wakil Kepala Daerah. Jurnal Ekonomi, Sosial & Humaniora, 3(01), 91–104.
HR, R., Heryansyah, SHI., MH., D., & Pratiwi, SH., MH., D. K. (2018). Perluasan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(2), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art7
Ihfan, A. N. (2024). Problematika Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Pengujian Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang. Media Iuris, 7(1), 69–100. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v7i1.44793
Jaelani, A. Q. J. (2017). Kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Mengadili Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Negatif dan Fiktif Positif. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v6i2.2019
MAKSUM, H. (2020). Batasan Kewenangan Mengadili Pengadilan Umum Dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Yang Melibatkan Badan Negara Atau Pejabat Pemerintah Ditinjau Dari Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2019. JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani, 2(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.46601/juridica.v2i1.178
Masloman, N. (2022). Kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Baik (Good Governance). Lex Administratum, 1(1), 8.
Pamungkas, Y. (2020). Pergeseran Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Acta Diurnal, 3, 339–359.
Ptun, N., Subyek, A., & Di, S. (2024). JUSTICES : Journal of Law Kewenangan Atau Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha. 3(1), 47–57.
Pulungan, K., Khoirotun, I., Pulungan, N., & At, D. (2024). Kewenangan PTUN Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Hukum Ditinjau dari Aspek Hukum Tata Negara. 2(2), 1422–1431.
Putrijanti Aju. (2015). Kewenangan Serta Objek Sengketa di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Setelah Ada UU No. 30/2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 44(4), 425–430. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/153491-ID-kewenangan-serta-obyek-sengketa-di-perad.pdf
Tuela, A. M., Palilingan, T. N., & Dapu, F. M. (2018). Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Yang Dilakukan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara. E-Journal Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 25(2), 6.
Wahyunadi, Y. M. (2007). Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. Hukum, 1(5), 1–11.
Yanti, H., & Masriyani, M. (2019). Implementasi Perluasan Kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jambi. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 11(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v11i2.177
Zulaichah, S. (2022). Kajian Contempt Of Court di Indonesia. Journal of Constitutional Law, 4(3), 2022. http://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/albalad
Copyright (c) 2025 Fira Ariani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
