Studi komparatif kurikulum pendidikan di beberapa negara maju sebagai rujukan di Indonesia
Keywords:
Curriculum, global education, finland, japan, united states, singaporeAbstract
This study examines a comparative analysis of curriculum systems in several developed countries—Finland, Japan, the United States, and Singapore—with the aim of identifying insights and best practices that can be adapted for curriculum development in Indonesia. The background of this research lies in the crucial role of the curriculum as a primary guideline determining the direction, content, and quality of learning within educational institutions. This study employs a library research method by analyzing relevant literature and previous studies related to the curriculum systems of each country. The findings reveal that Finland emphasizes equality and student well-being, Japan focuses on character and moral development, the United States highlights flexibility and decentralization, while Singapore stands out in academic excellence and bilingual education. Each model presents its own strengths and challenges that can serve as valuable references in designing a national curriculum that is adaptive, humanistic, and relevant to the educational demands of the 21st century.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
