Keadilan yang berpihak

Membedah diskriminasi dalam sistem penegakan hukum Indonesia

  • Muhammad David Febrian Nurzaki Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
Keywords: Legal discrimination, law enforcement, social justice, judicial reform, equality before the law

Abstract

This study examines discrimination issues within Indonesia's law enforcement system, revealing fundamental gaps between constitutional principles and field practices. Through a juridical-normative approach reinforced by sociological analysis, this research uncovers systematic discrimination occurring at every stage of legal proceedings, from investigation to verdict execution. Findings indicate that socio-economic status, political power, and financial capacity serve as primary determinants in legal processes and outcomes. The striking disparity in sentencing between corruption cases involving trillions in state losses and minor criminal cases affecting lower-class communities reflects a double standard within the judicial system. Unequal access to legal aid, weak integrity among law enforcement officers, power intervention, and low legal awareness among society constitute mutually reinforcing root problems. The impacts extend beyond eroding public trust in judicial institutions to widening social gaps and threatening national stability. Addressing these issues requires comprehensive reform encompassing strengthened judicial independence, system digitalization for enhanced transparency, equitable expansion of legal aid access, and continuous capacity and integrity improvement among law enforcement officers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adityo, R. D. (2013). Mencari konsep wajah sistem hukum nasional: Studi tentang polemik dan tantangan penegakan hukum progresif dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 146–164. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/11302/

Haidarrani, A., Hairani, J., Niken, S., Mubarokah, W., Fidiyani, R., & Sastroatmodjo, S. (n.d.). Diskriminasi dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kelompok Minoritas Agama: Studi Kasus Pembatasan Ruang Publik di Indonesia.

I Gede Sujana & I Wayan Kandia. (2024). Indikator Lemahnya Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. IJOLARES : Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 2(2), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v2i2.67

Jundiani, J., Hastuti, N. T., & Sukadi, I. (2025). Hukum tata negara. Metro Press Indonesia. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/24447/

Marwela Remini Seo, Fenetson Pairikas, & Yakobus Adi Saingo. (2025). Potret Diskriminasi Agama di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Implementasi Nilai Keadilan Sosial bagi Kelompok Minoritas. Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah, 3(1), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.59059/mutiara.v3i1.2139

Mengawal Reformasi Hukum Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045. (n.d.). Retrieved December 7, 2025, from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mengawal-reformasi-hukum-menuju-indonesia-emas-2045-lt6600e1613aa1b/

Saifullah, S. (2020). Senjakala keadilan: Risalah paradigma baru penegakan hukum di Indonesia. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/7880/

Tren Vonis Kasus Korupsi 2023 | ICW. (n.d.). Retrieved December 3, 2025, from https://antikorupsi.org/id/tren-vonis-kasus-korupsi-2023

Vidyapramatya, N. N. (2021). Hilangnya Keadilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Menurut Teori Diskriminasi. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 8(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v8i2.49763

Yozami, M. A. (n.d.). Praktisi Hukum Ini Sebut Percepatan Reformasi Hukum Harus Jadi Prioritas 2025. hukumonline.com. Retrieved December 7, 2025, from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/praktisi-hukum-ini-sebut-percepatan-reformasi-hukum-harus-jadi-prioritas-2025-lt6772b7bee99f0/

PlumX Metrics

Published
2026-04-22
How to Cite
Febrian Nurzaki, M. D. (2026). Keadilan yang berpihak. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(4), 85-93. Retrieved from https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/25049
Section
Articles