Implications Implikasi Putusan MK No.135/PUU-XXII/2024 terhadap keserentakan pemilu nasional

  • diva kurnia dwi salsabila Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Keywords: Constitutional Court Decision135/2024, simultaneous elections, national elections, Indonesia, politics

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024 marks a significant shift in the design of electoral simultaneity in Indonesia. The decision affirms that national elections and regional head elections can no longer be held simultaneously, but must instead be separated in order to align with the principles of effective administration, legal certainty, and the protection of citizens’ political rights. This change emerged in response to the complexity of the 2019 simultaneous elections, which resulted in excessive workloads for election administrators, a high potential for administrative errors, and a decline in the quality of voter participation. This article aims to comprehensively examine the juridical and practical implications of the decision for the architecture of national electoral simultaneity. Employing normative legal research methods through statutory, conceptual, and judicial decision approaches, the study analyzes how the legal construction embodied in Constitutional Court Decision No. 135 reshapes the regulation of electoral simultaneity under the Election Law. The findings indicate that separating national elections from regional elections gives rise to three main implications. First, there is a repositioning of the norm of simultaneity that necessitates adjustments to the constitutional calendar, particularly with regard to the nomination stages and the terms of office of public officials. Second, such separation creates opportunities to improve the quality of election administration, as the focus and workload of election organizers become more proportionate. Third, this change affects national and local political configurations, since the cycles of political legitimacy at the central and regional levels no longer operate concurrently. The study concludes that Constitutional Court Decision No. 135 not only addresses technical issues of election administration, but also provides a new direction for a more systematic and sustainable model of Indonesia’s electoral democratic governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abadi, S. A. (2022). Mekanisme Penetapan Ambang Batas (Threshold) Terhadap Stabilitas Sistem Presidensial Dan Sistem Multipartai Sederhana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi Dan Demokrasi, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/JKD.v2i1.1202

Ardipandanto, A. (2024). Peran Badan Pengawas Pemilu Dalam Mengurangi ( Penyebaran ) Hoaks Jelang Pemilu 2024.

Arifatuzzahrah, F., & Hasba, I. B. (2024). Kepastian hukum putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu terhadap pelanggaran kode etik penyelenggara pemilu. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(1), 70–83. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/18635/

Baehaki, K. (2025). Masa Depan Pemilu Indonesia: Implikasi Hukum dan Politik Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 135/PUU-XII/2024: The Future of Elections in Indonesia: Legal and Political Implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XII/2024. Jurnal Media Hukum, 13(2), 265–274.

Begouvic, M. E. H., & Cuan, B. (2021). Money Politik Pada Kepemiluan di Indonesia. Sol Justicia, 4(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.54816/sj.v4i2.451

Bidja, I. (2022). Fungsi Pengawasan Partisipatif Dalam Mewujudkan Pemilu Demokratis. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 6(1), 2034–2041.

Fathurokhman, B. (2022). Partisipasi Politik Pemilih Pemula dalam Pemilihan Umum (PEMILU). Journal of Research and Development on Public Policy, 1(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.58684/jarvic.v1i1.68

Fatullah, A. A., M. Maghfur Agung, & Rahmah Meladiah. (2025). Implikasi Konstitusional dan Sistemik: Analisis Putusan MK Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang Pemisahan Pemilu Nasional dan Pilkada. ELQONUN: Jurnal Hukum Ketatanegaraan, 3(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.19109/elqonun.v3i1.30988

Irawan, F. (2024). Analisis Pelaksanaan Pemilu 2024 Ditinjau Dari Aspek Yuridis Dan Perspektif Mahasiswa. Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science, 4(4), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.54957/jolas.v4i4.849

Jaya, A., Syamsuddin, D., & Alimuddin, A. (2020). Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum Di Kota Makassar: Studi Bawaslu Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Vox Populi, 2(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.24252/vp.v2i2.11675

Ningrum, A. R. M., Fahrunnisak, D., & Nuqul, F. L. (2014). Poster Cantik, Pemilu Tanpa Konflik. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/313/

Rantau, M. I. (2019). Penguatan Sistem Presidensial Di Indonesia: Analisis Terhadap Undang Undang No 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Karya Ilmiah, 19(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.33592/pelita.Vol19.Iss2.120

Sadzali, A. (2022). Peranan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mewujudkan Demokrasi Substantif pada Pemilu 2024 melalui Penegakan Hukum Progresif. As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(2), 193–218.

Sinaga, K. (2023). Analisis partisipasi publik menuju demokrasi berkualitas pada pemilihan umum Indonesia tahun 2024. Warta Dharmawangsa, 17(3), 1396–1412.

Supriyadi, A. P. (2023). Sistem Pemilu Tertutup Mencederai Konstitusi. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/14907/

Zainin, F., Darlisma, D., & Jasmalinda, J. (2024). Polemik Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2024 Di Indonesia. Menara Ilmu, 18(1).

PlumX Metrics

Published
2026-02-24
How to Cite
salsabila, diva. (2026). Implications Implikasi Putusan MK No.135/PUU-XXII/2024 terhadap keserentakan pemilu nasional. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(3), 427-435. Retrieved from https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/25108
Section
Articles