Algoritma dan Diskriminasi

Siapa yang bertanggung jawab atas pelanggaran HAM oleh AI

  • Revan Hilalfi Ramadhan Program Studi Manajemen, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Keywords: Algorithms, discrimination, responsibility, human rights violations, artificial intelligence (AI)

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has brought significant benefits to various sectors of life. However, despite the efficiency offered, AI algorithms also have the potential to violate human rights through discriminatory decisions against certain groups based on race, gender, religion, or socioeconomic status. This article addresses the central question: who is legally and ethically responsible for human rights violations caused by algorithms? Using a normative approach and analyzing case studies of algorithmic discrimination (such as recruitment systems, credit scoring, and facial recognition), this study identifies five parties with varying levels of responsibility: algorithm developers, AI service providers, governments/regulators, end users, and international standard-setters. The analysis shows that responsibility cannot be assigned solely to non-human entities (AI), but rather is multifaceted and layered (shared and layered accountability). This article concludes that a comprehensive regulatory framework, redress mechanisms for victims, and the principle of meaningful human control are needed to ensure accountability for any human rights violations resulting from algorithmic systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aufabrina, Shadia Yosvita. (2025). Implementasi HAM berlandaskan Pancasila dan Demokrasi: Penegakan hukum oleh Lembaga peradilan di Indonesia. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(12). https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/19801

Faslah, R. (2025). Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Negara dan Panduan Hidup Berbangsa. UIN Malang Press. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/24376/

Huda, M. Mi., Suwandi, S., & Rofiq, A. (2022). Implementasi tanggung jawab negara terhadap pelanggaran HAM berat paniai perspektif teori efektivitas hukum Soerjono Soekanto. IN RIGHT: Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azazi Manusia, 11(1), 115–134. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/11252/

Jailani, M. S. F. (2025). Peran kecerdasan buatan dalam pemetaan risiko ekonomi makro. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(12). https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/15883

Kusumawati, R. (2007). Artificial intelligence: Menyamai kecerdasan buatan Ilahi? UIN-Maliki Press. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/1279/

Mardani, M. (2023). Hukum dan keadilan sosial tantangan dan peluang dalam menghadapi perubahan sosial dan teknologi.

Rahmadina, A., & Faslah, R. (2025). Perlindungan Hak Cipta Di Era Digital Dalam Perspektif Cyber Law. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Digital, 2(4), 2251–2257.

Yordiansyah, A., Farida, A., & Pramono, A. (2026). Dilema Mens Rea pada Algoritma Self-Learning: Siapa yang Bertanggung Jawab Pidana Ketika AI Melakukan Diskriminasi Sistemik? Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 10(2), 358–374.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2026-05-06
How to Cite
Ramadhan, R. (2026). Algoritma dan Diskriminasi. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(6), 315-322. Retrieved from https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/25787
Section
Articles