Dari kritik ke kriminalisasi

Analisis hakikat dan majaz terhadap ujaran sarkasme kepada pemerintah dalam Pasal 27 ayat (3) UU ITE

  • Muhammad Ashabil Fazri UIN MAULANA MALIK IBRAHIM MALANG
Keywords: Sarcasm, haqiqah, majaz, criminalization, Electronic Information Law, freedom of speech, rubber article

Abstract

Freedom of speech is a constitutional right guaranteed by Article 28E paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia, yet in practice it is frequently threatened by the application of Article 27 paragraph (3) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), which is widely criticized for its ambiguous and multi-interpretable provisions. A growing phenomenon in Indonesian legal practice is the criminalization of sarcastic utterances directed at the government or public officials, wherein law enforcement authorities often interpret criticism wrapped in sarcasm as defamation or insult. This article examines the issue from the perspective of Arabic rhetorical science (balaghah), specifically the concepts of haqiqah (literal meaning) and majaz (figurative meaning), as an analytical framework to dissect the linguistic nature of sarcastic speech. Haqiqah refers to the literal meaning of a word, while majaz denotes the use of a word in a non-literal sense, marked by context and qarinah (contextual indicators). Through a juridical-normative and linguistic analysis approach, this article argues that sarcasm is essentially a form of majaz that must not be interpreted literally. The criminalization of sarcastic utterances directed at the government not only contradicts principles of freedom of expression but also reflects a hermeneutic crisis in legal interpretation that fails to comprehend the linguistic dimension in its entirety. The article concludes that clear linguistic interpretation guidelines are urgently needed in the application of Article 27 paragraph (3) of the UU ITE to prevent it from becoming an instrument to silence legitimate public criticism of the government.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azhar, A. F., & Soponyono, E. (2020). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Pengaturan dan Penanggulangan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) di Media Sosial. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i2.275-290
Fitri, T., Arifah, B., Fikri, S., & Hidayat, H. (2025). Bahasa, Pendidikan, dan Agama dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Lahjah Arabiyah: Journal of Arabic Language and Arabic Language Education, 6(1), 38–54. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/24068/
Hilmi, D. (2016). Analisis Kontrastif Majaz Bahasa Arab-Indonesia dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran Ilmu Bayan Pada Mata Kuliah Balaghah II [Research]. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/2856/
Indriyana, S. N., & Pangesti, F. (2022). Kritik dan Sarkasme Pada Kinerja Gubernur Anies Baswedan di Twitter: Kajian Sosolinguistik (Criticism and Sarcasm on the Performance of Governor Anies Baswedan on Twitter: A Sosolinguistic Study). Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 8(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v8i1.10113
Kuswoyo, K. (2015). Dualisme Hakekat-Majaz. El-Wasathiya: Jurnal Studi Agama, 3(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.35888/el-wasathiya.v3i1.2007
Munir. (2024). Kajian Pasal 27 A UU No. 1 Tahun 2024 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2008 Tentang ITE: Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 13(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.34304/jf.v13i2.284
Pranata, Y. W. (2025). Rekonstruksi Pasal 27 Ayat (3) UU ITE Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kebebasan Berpendapat Di Indonesia. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 3(2), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v3i2.164
Puspita, S. A., & Nurunnisa. (2025). Kedudukan Linguis Forensik Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik: Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(6), 3790–3798. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i6.7918
Putra, A. E., & Tantimin, T. (2022). Kajian Hukum Pasal 27 Ayat 3 UU ITE Terhadap Kebebasan Berpendapat Masyarakat. Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 9(5), 2366–2374. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v9i5.2366-2374
Setiawan, M. N. (2021). Mengkritisi Undang-Undang ITE Pasal 27 Ayat (3) dilihat dari Sosio-Politik Hukum Pidana Indonesia. DATIN LAW JURNAL, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.36355/dlj.v2i1.561
Shabriyah, N. S., & Nuruddien, M. (2022). A Kontribusi Ilmu Balaghah terhadap Makna dan Sastra yang Terkandung dalam Ayat-Ayat Al-Qurâ€TMan : El-Wasathiya: Jurnal Studi Agama, 10(01), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.35888/el-wasathiya.v10i01.4830
Zaman, S., Yaqin, M. A., & Chamidy, T. (2025). Negativity Bias Pada Pengguna Media Sosial dan Implikasinya Bagi Perilaku Toxic. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/25184/

PlumX Metrics

Published
2026-06-05
How to Cite
Fazri, M. (2026). Dari kritik ke kriminalisasi. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(7), 451-459. Retrieved from https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/29918
Section
Articles