Peran Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) Surabaya dalam melaksanakan eksekusi berkekuatan hukum tetap
Abstract
Execution is the implementation of a court decision that has permanent legal force. In Article 116 of Law No. 5 of 1986, paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) explain that every TUN official who loses in a trial must carry out the contents of the court decision. If the losing party does not carry out the results of the decision, then the winning party may submit a request for execution to TUN court, and if the results of the decision have not been implemented, the head of the court can submit this matter to his superior agency according to his position level, and if the results of the decision are still not implemented, the head of the court submits this matter to the president as the holder of the highest government power to order the official to carry out the verdict. As explained in articles (4), (5), and (6). From the results of this research, readers can find out the role of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) in ensuring the implementation of court decisions, the importance of effective implementation in maintaining the rule of law and administrative justice, and challenges and deficiencies in the implementation of court decisions, including the lack of legal regulation and compliance problems by government officials. The author suggests that a clean and strong government can be achieved by increasing the functionality and performance of the government system.
Downloads
References
Amnesti, M. A. (2022). Problematika Penanganan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah: onrechtmatige overheidsdad pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol. 14, No. 1, 2022, 125-139.
Butt, S. (1999). The Eksekusi of The Negara Hukum: Implementing Judicial Decision in Indoensia dalam Timothy Lindsey (Editor), Indonesia: Law and Society. Melbourne : The Federation Press.
Erwin, Y. P. (2015). Kajian Yuridis Mengenai Pelaksanaan Eksekusi dalam Pengadaan Hubungan Industrial. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 9.
Lita Lianti, F. S. (2023). Peran PTUN dalam Eksekusi Putusan yang Berkekuatan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa TUN . Yustisi Jurnal Hukum & Hukum Islam 10, No. 2, 80.
Lotulung, P. E. (2003). Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia Dibandingkan Dengan Peradilan Adminitrasi Yang Berlaku di Berbagai Negara: Dalam Mengkaji Kembali Pokok-Pokok Pikiran Pembentukan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara . Jakarta: LPP-HAN.
Marpaung, A. (2010). Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Melalui Upaya Paksa . Surabaya: Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Airlangga .
Muammar Salam, A. M. (2021). Menakar Upaya Penegakan Hukum Oleh Pemerintah Kota Makassar. Jurnal Siyasatuna Volume 3 Nomor 1, 117.
Pattipawae, D. R. (2019). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara di Era Otonomi. Sasi 25, No. 1, 92.
Pudyatmoko, S. (1996). Peradian Tata Usaha Negara Sebagai Salah Satu Fungsi Kontrol Pemerintah . Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya .
Putra, F. S. (2021). Problem Eksekutorial Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Justisi 7, 6.
Putra, F. S. (n.d.). Problem Eksekutorial Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Justisi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong, Vol. 7 No. 1, 71.
Rumadan, I. (2010). Eksekutabilitas Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Megamendung: Balitbang Pendidikan dan Pelatihan dan Peradilan Mahkmaah Agung RI.
Socawiba, N. I. (2023). Efektivitas Eksekusi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin 2, 45-52.
Soleh, M. A. (2018). Eksekusi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap. Mimbar Keadilan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum , 21.
Supandi. (2005). Kepatuhan Pejabat Dalam Menaati Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara . Medan: Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sumatera Utara .
Suyanto, W. F. (2022). Efektivitas Eksekusi Upaya Paksa . Jurnal Al Tasyri'iyyah No. 1, 34-47.
Copyright (c) 2024 Gustian Hafizh Hilmy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
