Perbandingan mutu tenaga pendidik di Indonesia dan Finlandia
Abstract
Educators are one of the biggest factors in the development of education. Finland is one of the countries with the best education system, including in assuring the quality of its educators. With the condition of the quality of Indonesian educators who are still ranked 14th among developing countries, it is necessary to have a comparison as a measuring tool in improving the quality management of Indonesian educators. Therefore, this study aims to describe the quality management of educators in Finland and describe the improvement of quality management of Indonesian educators. The result of this research is that the quality assurance of educators in Finland starts from before the acceptance of prospective students to prospective teachers. The Indonesian government has also improved the quality of teaching staff with several programs, namely the driving teacher school, teacher professional education, and pembaTIK.
Downloads
References
Agustyaningrum, N., & Himmi, N. (2022). Best practices sistem pendidikan di Finlandia sebagai refleksi sistem pendidikan di Indonesia. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 2100–2109. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2234
Hutagaluh, O. (2022). Pendidikan di Finlandia: Kemajuan dan contoh untuk Indonesia.
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Pendidikan guru penggerak. https://sekolah.penggerak.kemdikbud.go.id/gurupenggerak/detil-program/
Kemendikbudristek. (2023, October 10). PembaTIK 2023: Memperkuat pendidikan digital dan memberdayakan guru sebagai pemimpin teknologi. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi.
Liputan6.com. (2021, April 15). Kemendikbud Sebut 60 persen guru masih terbatas menguasai teknologi informasi.
Pangestika, R. R., & Alfarisa, F. (2015). Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG): Strategi pengembangan profesionalitas guru dan peningkatan mutu pendidikan Indonesia.
Putra, I. E. D., Ananda, A., & Gistituati, N. (2023). Perbandingan kurikulum pendidikan Indonesia dan Finlandia. 06(01).
Qulsum, D. U., & Hermanto. (2022). Peran guru penggerak dalam penguatan profil pelajar pancasila sebagai ketahanan pendidikan karakter abad 21. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.22146/jkn.71741
Riowati, R., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2022). Peran guru penggerak pada merdeka belajar untuk memperbaiki mutu pendidikan di Indonesia. Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI), 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v5i1.3393
Syamsul Hadi. (2013). Pembelajaran sosial emosional sebagai dasar pendidikan karakter anak usia dini. Jurnal Teknodik, 227–240.
Widyawati, R., & Rachmadyanti, P. (2023). Analisis penerapan pembelajaran berdiferensiasi. 11.
Yanuarti, R. (2021). Pedoman penyelenggaraan pembatik dan pemilihan duta rumah belajar. PUSDATIN KEMENDIKBUD.
Yuliyanti, Y., Damayanti, E., & Nulhakim, L. (2022). Perkembangan kurikulum sekolah dasar di Indonesia dan perbedaan dengan kurikulum di beberapa negara. Lingua Rima: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 11(3), 95. https://doi.org/10.31000/lgrm.v11i3.7271
Zulfitri, H., Setiawati, N. P., & Ismaini. (2019). Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) sebagai upaya meningkatkan profesionalisme guru. LINGUA, 19(02).
Copyright (c) 2024 Berliana Rasyida

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



