Kedudukan judicial review Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Undang-Undang Otonomi Khusus Provinsi Papua

  • Zakia Amilia Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Keywords: laws; special autonomy; judicial review

Abstract

Law Number 2 of 2021 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua has become the focus of attention in the realm of law and policy in Indonesia. As a regulation governing special autonomy in Papua, this law has a significant impact on political, social and economic dynamics in the region. Even though it aims to improve community welfare and strengthen development, the Law has also sparked debate and controversy regarding a number of its articles and provisions. Therefore, it is important to review the validity and conformity of the law with the constitution through the concept of judicial review. This research comprehensively discusses the position of the Constitutional Court's judicial review of the Papua Province Special Autonomy Law. Through normative, statutory, comparative and conceptual approaches, this research analyzes the legal standing for submitting a judicial review and reviews Constitutional Court decisions regarding similar cases. Various aspects related to legal standing and arguments supporting anyone's right to submit a judicial review are also studied in the context of Law Number 2 of 2021. The research results show the urgency to review the validity and conformity of this Law with the Indonesian Constitution, especially in the context of human rights and sustainable development in Papua Province. The concept of judicial review and legal standing is important in ensuring legal compliance with the constitution, with members of the DPR RI, indigenous peoples and civil society organizations having legal standing to submit a judicial review. Thus, this research contributes to understanding the role of the Constitutional Court in ensuring legal compliance with the constitution amidst political and social dynamics in Papua.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hermawaty, N., Pratama, A. G., Nusa, N. D., & Tulus, D. (n.d.). Kedudukan Judicial Review sebagai Pembangunan Hukum di Indonesia. 1(1).

Idris, M., & Umar, K. (2020). Dinamika Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memutus Perkara Judicial Review. Siyasatuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar’iyyah, 1(2), 263–277.

Isharyanto, S., & Dila Eka Juli Prasetya, S. (2021). Hukum Pemerintahan Desa:(Perspektif, Konseptualisasi Dan Konteks Yuridis). Absolute Media.

Kesuma, A. Y. (2011). Analisis Kedudukan Hukum (Legal Standing) Warga Negara Indonesia sebagai Subyek Pemohon dalam Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Pratama, M. Z. (2024). Analisis Yuridis tentang Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.

Wicaksono, D. A. (2023). Dynamics of Granting Legal Standing to the Indigenous Community in Constitutional Review of Law: Dinamika Pemberian Kedudukan Hukum Pemohon bagi Masyarakat Hukum Adat dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(3), 494–513.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2024-12-31
How to Cite
Amilia, Z. (2024). Kedudukan judicial review Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Undang-Undang Otonomi Khusus Provinsi Papua. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(12), 102-106. Retrieved from https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/8061
Section
Articles