Paradox of choice dalam penyaringan informasi media sosial

Authors

  • ziyada rohmah Mahasiswa

Keywords:

paradox of choice, information filtering, social media, information overload, social media algorithms

Abstract

The development of social media has made it easier for people to obtain information quickly and widely. However, the abundance of information on social media has also created the phenomenon of information overload, which makes users struggle to select relevant and trustworthy information. This condition is related to the concept of Paradox of Choice, a situation in which too many choices trigger confusion, doubt, and fatigue in decision-making. This article aims to analyze the influence of Paradox of Choice on the process of information filtering on social media and its impact on user behavior in consuming digital information. This study uses a descriptive-analytical approach with a literature study method from various scientific sources, such as journals, books, and academic articles. The findings show that the large amount of information choices and the influence of social media algorithms can trigger digital anxiety, reduce user focus, and shape limited information consumption patterns within an echo chamber. Therefore, digital literacy and information filtering skills are important abilities for society in facing the flow of digital information more critically and wisely.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ananda, E. R., & Marno, M. (2023). Analisis Dampak Penggunaan Teknologi Media Sosial terhadap Perilaku Bullying di Kalangan Siswa Sekolah Dasar Ditinjau dari Nilai Karakter Self-Confident Siswa dalam Konteks Pendidikan. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 5(5), 2207–2217. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v5i5.5206

Arafah, B., & Hasyim, M. (2022). Social Media as a Gateway to Information: Digital Literacy on Current Issues in Social Media. Webology, 19(1), 2491–2503. https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V19I1/WEB19167

Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2020). Information Overload: An Introduction. In D. Bawden & L. Robinson, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1360

Bhugra, D., & Ventriglio, A. (2023). Geographical Determinants of Mental Health. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 69(4), 811–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640231169816

Bruns, A. (2019). Filter bubble. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1426

Dai, B., Ali, A., & Wang, H. (2020). Exploring information avoidance intention of social media users: A cognition–affect–conation perspective. Internet Research, 30(5), 1455–1478. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-06-2019-0225

Graf, B., & Antoni, C. H. (2023). Drowning in the flood of information: A meta-analysis on the relation between information overload, behaviour, experience, and health and moderating factors. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 32(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2022.2118051

Marsh, E., Perez Vallejos, E., & Spence, A. (2024). Overloaded by Information or Worried About Missing Out on It: A Quantitative Study of Stress, Burnout, and Mental Health Implications in the Digital Workplace. Sage Open, 14(3), 21582440241268830. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241268830

Misra, S., & Stokols, D. (2012). Psychological and Health Outcomes of Perceived Information Overload. Environment and Behavior, 44(6), 737–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511404408

Peng, M., Xu, Z., & Huang, H. (2021). How Does Information Overload Affect Consumers’ Online Decision Process? An Event-Related Potentials Study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, 695852. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.695852

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

rohmah, ziyada. (2026). Paradox of choice dalam penyaringan informasi media sosial. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(9), 416–421. Retrieved from https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/26615

Issue

Section

Articles