Problematika kedudukan dan kewenangan peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia
Keywords:
PERMA, supreme court, judicial legislation, separation of powers, constitutionalAbstract
The Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) is a regulatory instrument established by the Supreme Court to support the effectiveness of the administration of justice in Indonesia. PERMA serves to fill legal gaps, clarify technical provisions of the judiciary, and support the realization of the principles of simple, fast, and low-cost justice. However, the development of PERMA has given rise to debate when its substance is considered no longer limited to technical and administrative aspects, but also contains new legal norms of a general nature. This study aims to analyze the position of PERMA in the legal regulatory system, the authority of the Supreme Court in establishing PERMA viewed from the perspective of constitutional law, and the problems of PERMA that contain new norms. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results show that PERMA is recognized under Article 8 of Law Number 12 of 2011 even though it is not included in the main hierarchy of laws and regulations. The Supreme Court's authority to establish PERMA is a form of constitutional necessity, but must still be limited by the principles of legality, separation of powers, judicial restraint, and checks and balances to prevent the expansion of judicial functions into the realm of legislation.
Downloads
References
Annisa. (2020). Analisis Hukum E-Litigasi Jo. Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik Dihubungkan Dengan Undang- Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Jo. Undang- Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 JO. Undang- Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009. Jurnal Negara dan Keadilan, 9(2), 180.
Ariani, N. V. (2018). Gugatan Sederhana dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia (Small Claim Lawsuit in Indonesian Justice System) Nevey. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, 18(3), 381–383.
Bearly Deo Syahputra, E. P. K. (2021). Problematika Keabsahan Pembuktian Pada Implementasi Persidangan Elektronik (E-Litigasi). Supremasi Hukum :Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 30(2), 148.
Bhakti, T. S. (2014). Rancangan Undang-Undang Mahkamah Agung (RUU MA): Pengkajian Filosofi, Sejarah, Asas, Norma dalam Dinamika Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 3(2), 137–148.
Dehi, A. P. (2013). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundangundangan di Indonesia.
Djaman, R. P. (2018). Titik Singgung Kewenangan Perubahan Perundang – Undangan Antara Badan Legislatif Dan Badan Yudikatif (Studi Tentang Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan Dan Jumlah Denda). Lex Administratum, 6(2), 108.
Fathorrahman. (2018). Peraturan Delegasi Dalam Sistem Peraturan Perudang-Undangan Indonesia. JURNAL RECHTENS, 7(2), 193–194.
Hakim, M. A. (2022). Problematika Penanganan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah ( onrechtmatige overheidsdaad ) pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 14(1), 128. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/11155/
Nelly Mulia Husma, Faisal A. Rani, S. H. (2017). Kewenangan Pengaturan Mahkamah Agung (Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 Tentang Larangan Peninjauan Kembali Putusan Praperadilan). Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 1(1), 2.
Nugroho, A. A., & Yasin, I. F. (2025). Kedudukan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung ( PERMA ) Dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Justitiable Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 137.
Parikesit, R. A. (2021). Penerapan Asas Legalitas (Legaliteit Beginsel/Wetmatigheid Van Bestuur) Dalam Kebijakan Sentralisasi Pengharmonisasian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(4), 454.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana (2015).
Pitoy, C. B. (2018). PERSpektif Perubahan Perundang – Undangan Oleh Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Kajian Terhadap Terbitnya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana. Lex Administratum, 6(3), 183.
Simanjuntak, E. (2013). Kewenangan Hak Uji Materil Pada Mahkamah Agung RI. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2(3), 337.
Subiyanto, A. E. (2012). Mendesain Kewenangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(4), 666.
Sukadi, I. (2020). Asas Contrarius Actus Sebagai Kontrol Pemerintah Terhadap Kebebasan Berserikat Dan Berkumpul di Indonesia. Jurnal Mimbar Keadilan, 12(2), 189–190. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/4546/3/4546.pdf
Sukadi, I. (2021). Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia dan Implikasinya Dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa Dan Bernegara. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 4(1), 123. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/7906/
Sunarto. (2016). Prinsip Checks And Balances Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Masalah - Masalah Hukum, 45(2), 159–162.
Tamin, B. E. D. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (Perma) Dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang- Undangan Di Indonesia. Lex Administratum, 4(3), 113–115.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (1945).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dini Febriana Sofi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
