Upaya hukum dalam penyelesaian kontrak bisnis di Indonesia
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the choice of law in conflict resolution. The research method uses a normative juridical research type, with a statutory approach. The results of the discussion show that in completing contract settlements, there are 2 types of legal options, namely litigation and non-litigation. Litigation legal efforts are efforts that can be made by the disputing parties through the courts. Meanwhile, what is meant by non-litigation legal remedies are legal efforts that can be made outside the court. Non-litigation legal remedies are regulated in Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Article 1 Paragraph (10) of the Law explains that there are several legal remedies that can be made outside the court, namely consultation, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, and arbitration or expert judgment. Litigation legal efforts will provide legal certainty because they are binding and have the nature of a win-lose solution. Meanwhile, non-litigation legal remedies will be more efficient in terms of time and cost, maintain the confidentiality of the parties, and are a win-win solution.
Downloads
References
Andrianto, N., Assery, S., & Suhartono, S. (2022). "Mediasi Sebagai Salah Satu Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa". National Conference on Applied Business, Education, & Technology (NCABET), 2(1), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.46306/ncabet.v2i1.78
Gumbira, S. W., Sulistiyono, A., & Soehartono, S. (2020). "Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Outside the Court According to Law Number 14 of 2001 On Patent". Hang Tuah Law Journal, 4(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v4i2.20
Haspada, D. (2019). "Arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution for land disputes based on Indonesian regulation". International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 8(5), 294–305.
Isa, M. J. H., Zakiah, N., & Ruslan, F. F. A. (2022). "Upaya Non Litigasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Penyerobotan Tanah". Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani, 2(3), 1463. https://doi.org/10.54259/mudima.v2i3.591
Jamal, M., Mahfudz, A. A., Syamsuri, S., & Handayani, R. (2021). "Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution in non-litigation dispute resolution on Islamic Mortgage: at the Ombudsman Institution Yogyakarta". Tsaqafah, 17(1), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v17i1.6760
Lathif, A., & Habibaty, D. M. (2019). "Disparitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Jalur Litigasi Pada Polis Asuransi Syariah Dan Putusan Pengadilan". Αγαη, 8(5), 80.
Lukman Hakim, M., & Suksma Prijandhini Devi Salain, M. (2019). "Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Kontrak Kerjasama Internasional Antara Hotel Dengan Agen Perjalanan Online". OJS Unud, 8(1), 5.
Nugroho, S. A. (2019). Manfaat Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Pranada media.
Nurul Amalia Arifin, Asni Djamereng, S. M. J. (2020). "Strategi Komunikasi Pemasaran Event Organizer Pt. Tiga Production Dalam Mendapatkan Kepercayaan Pelanggan". Jurnal Kajian Dakwah, 1(3), 614–630. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/washiyah/article/view/16230
Priambodo, A. (2021). "Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Tentang Jasa Konstruksi". Iblam Law Review, 1(3), 4. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v1i3.49
Rahmawati, E. S. (2016). "Implikasi Mediasi Bagi Para Pihak yang Berperkara di Pengadilan Agama Malang". De Jure, 8(1), 1–14.
Sahlan Roy Matua, Ramadhita, H. (2017). "Nilai Keadilan Sebagai Landasan Putusan Sengketa Wanprestasi : Studi Putusan Nomor 5 / Ptd . Sus-BPSK / 2017 / PN". Lmj. Suara Hukum, 4(5), 245.
Santoso, L. (2018). Dinamika Hukum Kontrak Indonesia. TrussMedia Grafika.
Situmorang, M. (2022). "Measuring The Effectiveess of Consumer Dispute Resolution on Small Value E-Commerce Transaction". Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(4), 537. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.v22.537-550
Sudjana, S. (2018). "Efektivitas dan Efisiensi Penyelesaian Sengketa Kekayaan Intelektual melalui Arbitrase dan Mediasi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999". Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v2i1.598
Wati, G., Ilmu, M., Pascasarjana, H., & Kuning, U. L. (2022). "Apabila Terjadi Wanprestasi Dalam Transaksi Perjanjian Jual Beli Melalui Internet ( E- Commerce ) di Indonesia". NCSSR, 2(1), 984.
Yasin, N. (2022). "Aspek Perlindungan Hak Spiritual Konsumen dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Pembiayaan Murabahah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor Abstrak : Kata Kunci : Pendahuluan Mahkamah Konsitusi Republik Indonesia sebagai salah pelaku kekuasaan kehakiman". Al-Huquq: Journal of Indonesian Islamic Economic Law, 4(2), 167–195.
Copyright (c) 2024 Mochamad Lailul Fadlan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
