STRATEGI GURU DALAM MENUMBUHKAN COMPETITIVENESS SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN IPS
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the planning of teacher strategies in fostering student competitiveness, the implementation of those strategies in the classroom, and the evaluation methods used by teachers to cultivate student competitiveness within Social Studies lessons. This study employs a qualitative approach with a field research design, conducted at MTs Bahrul Ulum Tambakberas, Jombang. Research subjects were selected through purposive sampling, including the headmaster, vice-head of curriculum, Social Studies teachers, and students actively involved in the learning process. Data collection techniques included observation, interviews, and documentation. Data validity was ensured through source and technique triangulation, while data analysis followed the Miles and Huberman model, encompassing data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The research findings indicate that teacher strategy planning is carried out through the preparation of instructional tools, the setting of clear classroom goals, and the design of activities that encourage student participation and learning challenges. Furthermore, the implementation of these strategies is realized through interactive learning such as discussions, quizzes, and the provision of competitive stimuli capable of fully activating student engagement. Evaluation is utilized not only to measure learning outcomes but also as a foundation for reflection and the continuous improvement of instructional strategies. This study contributes to the strengthening of teaching practices in madrasas, the enrichment of academic studies at universities, and the development of Social Studies learning oriented toward student competitiveness.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk pertama, menganalisis perencanaan strategi guru dalam menumbuhkan competitiveness siswa, kedua menganalisis pelaksanaan strategi guru dalam menumbuhkan competitiveness siswa, dan strategi guru dalam mengevaluasi pembelajaran untuk menumbuhkan competitiveness siswa pada pelajaran IPS. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian lapangan. Lokasi penelitian di MTs Bahrul Ulum Tambakberas Jombang. Subjek penelitian dipilih melalui teknik purposive sampling, meliputi kepala madrasah, waka kurikulum, guru IPS dan siswa yang terlibat aktif dalam pembelajaran. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Keabsahan data diuji menggunakan triangulasi sumber dan teknik. Analisis data menggunakan model Miles dan Huberman yang meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama, perencanaan strategi guru dilakukan melalui penyusunan perangkat pembelajaran, penetapan tujuan kelas yang jelas, serta perancangan aktivitas yang mendorong partisipasi dan tantangan belajar siswa. Kedua, pelaksanaan strategi diwujudkan melalui pembelajaran interaktif seperti diskusi, kuis, dan pemberian stimulus kompetitif yang mampu mengaktifkan keterlibatan siswa secara menyeluruh. Ketiga, evaluasi dimanfaatkan tidak hanya untuk mengukur hasil belajar, tetapi juga sebagai dasar refleksi dan perbaikan strategi pembelajaran secara berkelanjutan. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam penguatan praktik pembelajaran di madrasah, pengayaan kajian akademik di universitas, serta pengembangan pembelajaran IPS yang berorientasi pada daya saing siswa.
Downloads
References
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260.
Aslamiyah, S., & Ansharuddin, M. (2025). Teachers’ Strategies in Improving Students’ Competitiveness Through Extracurricular Activities. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 15, 599–615. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54180/elbanat.2025.15.2.599-615
Bandura, A. (1991). Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy The Exercise of Control (S. Finnermore (ed.)). United States of America.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Budiman, A., Yusuf, F. A., & Hayadi, B. H. (2024). The Impact of Educator Effectiveness on Student Competitiveness : A Case Study in Cilegon City Junior High Schools. 4(001), 622–638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v4i001.445
Cresswell, J. W., & Cresswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In SAGE Publications (5th ed.). SAGE.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “ What ” and “ Why ” of Goal Pursuits : Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. 11(4), 227–268.
Guskey, T. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. CArfax Publishing, August 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Holubec, E. J., & Roy, P. (2014). Circles of Learning Cooperation in the Classroom.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of Teaching (M. D. F. Editorial (ed.); 9th ed.). Pearson.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Irvington Publishers Inc. New York Halsted Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Nabavi, R. T., & Bijandi, M. S. (2024). A literature review on Bandura ’ s Social Learning Theory & Social Cognitive Learning Theory. Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology, January 2012.
Nurlina, N., Nurdin, D., & Prihatin, E. (2023). Strategi Peningkatan Daya Saing melalui Program Pembelajaran Berbasis Pendidikan Islam. 7(5), 6052–6064. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i5.4660
OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 Results The State of Learning and Equity in Education: Vol. I. OECD Publishing.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (D. E. Axelsen (ed.); 3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Piaget, J. (1996). The Psychology of the Child. Presses Universitaires de France.
Purwati, P., Sari, I. N., Pratama, R. A., & Khoirun, F. (2025). Uncovering Competitive Behavior : How Critical Thinking , Self-Efficacy , and Social Comparison Shape College Students in Central Java , Indonesia Abstract : 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118743501383616250425105109
Rahardjo, M. (2022). Apa Itu Kuasi Kualitatif. 1–7.
Rochaendi, E., Fuadi, A., & Sholihah, D. A. (2024). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran (E. R. Desain (ed.); 1st ed.). ITERA PRESS.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. 55(1), 68–78.
Saul, MCleod, P. (2025). Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory. Simply Psychology.
Sugesti, T., & Siregar, A. N. (2025). Competitive School Culture Management in Cultivating Teacher Creativity and Innovation at SMA Negeri 2 Plus YPMHB Sipirok. Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.30596/jcositte.v1i1.xxxx
Tohari, B., & Rahman, A. (2024). Konstruktivisme Lev Semonovich Vygotsky dan Jerome Bruner : Model Pembelajaran Aktif dalam Pengembangan Kemampuan Kognitif Anak. 4(1).
Utami, I. G. A. L. P. (2016). Teori konstruktivisme dan teori sosiokultural: aplikasi dalam pengajaran bahasa inggris. 11(01), 4–11.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind In Society The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. C. Vera, V. Jolm-Steiner, & S. S. Ellen (eds.)). Harvard University Press.
Wijoyo, H., & Haudi, H. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran (H. Wijoyo (ed.); Issue March). Insan Cendekia Mandiri.
Wildaniyati, A., Mutmainah, & Indartini, M. (2021). Pelatihan Pengembangan Kompetensi dan Competitiveness Siswa Di Bidang Ilmu Sosial. 2014, 131–135.
