Supported vs Substituted: The Urgency of Regulating Limited Guardianship for Individuals with Psychosocial Disabilities in Islamic Inheritance

Frida Azmil Franola; Siti Rohmah; Shinta Puspita Sari

doi:10.18860/jfs.v9i1.14186

Frida Azmil Franola Brawijaya University, Indonesia
Siti Rohmah Brawijaya University, Indonesia
Shinta Puspita Sari Brawijaya University, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jfs.v9i1.14186

Keywords: Mental disability, Inheritance Assets, Islamic Law, Guardianship, Supported Decision-Making

Abstract

The authority to manage inheritance assets in Islamic inheritance law by guardians of individuals with psychosocial disabilities highlights the urgency of limiting such authority to preserve maqashid sharia, particularly the protection of individual property and life. Current regulations in Indonesia regarding guardianship remain discriminatory and do not explicitly restrict the powers of guardians, leading to potential abuse. This study aims to analyze the urgency of limited guardianship regulation from an Islamic legal perspective and to formulate a legal framework that aligns with the supported decision-making paradigm. The methodology employed is normative research using legal, conceptual, and comparative approaches against regulations in Aceh Besar, Pakistan, and England. The findings indicate that the current guardianship regulations in Indonesia tend to adopt a substituted decision-making paradigm, granting full authority to guardians without involving individuals with disabilities in decision-making processes. This paradigm contradicts the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) ratified by Indonesia. To address this legal gap, regulatory reform is necessary, including restricting guardian authority, implementing strict oversight, and establishing criminal penalties for guardians who violate these provisions. This study recommends adopting a more inclusive supported decision-making paradigm where guardians act as decision supporters without replacing the legal rights of individuals with disabilities. Such reform aligns with the principles of social justice in Pancasila and maqashid sharia, creating a more inclusive legal system that protects the rights of individuals with psychosocial disabilities while preventing discrimination and abuse of power in managing inheritance assets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Malik J. Makna Al-Sufaha dalam Al-Quran (Suatu Kajian Muqaran antara QS al Baqarah/2: 13 dengan QS an-Nisa’/4: 5). Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Makassar: Fakultas Ushuluddin Filsafat UIN Alauddin Makassar, 2022.

Abu Abdillah Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Abi Bakr bin Farh al-Ansari Syams al-Din al-Qurtubi. al-Jami’ li Ahkam al-Quran. Translated by Mahmud Hamid Utsam. Vol. V.

Abu al-fida Ismail bin Umar bin Kasir. Lubab al-Tafsir Min ibn Kasir. Translated by M. Abdul Ghoffat et al. Jilid II. Bogor: Pustaka Imam Syafi’i, 2004.

Anggi Ratulangi et al. “Hakikat Manusia Sebagai Individu Dan Keluarga Serta Masyarakat.” Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Studies (IJOMSS) 1, no. 1 (July 2023): 15. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=intitle:%27Hakikat%20Manusia%20Sebagai%20Individu%20dan%20Keluarga%20Serta%20Masyarakat%27.

Andrean Rifaldo. “Aksesibilitas 28 Juta Penyandang Disabilitas.” Kompas Lestari, November 27, 2023. Accessed March 24, 2024. https://lestari.kompas.com/read/2023/11/27/162704486/aksesibilitas-28-juta-penyandangdisabilitas.

Ayano Shanko et al. “Attitudes Towards Schizophrenia and Associated Factors Among Community Members in Hossana Town: A Mixed Method Study.” BMC Psychiatry 23, no. 80 (2023): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04555-9.

Ayudhia Kartika et al. “Prediksi Angka Kekambuhan pada Pasien Skizofrenia Episode Pertama dengan Kepatuhan Berobat Rendah dalam Waktu Tiga Tahun.” Jurnal Kesehatan Indonesia 2, no. 1 (April 2014): 53. https://doi.org/10.23886/ejki.2.3178.

Brian Martin. Information Liberation. London: Freedom Press, 1998.

Fakhrul Maulidin. Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menetapkan Permohonan dari Status Wali Pengampu (Studi Pengadilan Negeri Medan Kelas IA Nomor 137/Pdt.P/2019/PN.Mdn). Medan: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Medan Area, 2021.

Hukum Online. “Simak! Tafsir MK Terhadap Ketentuan Pengampuan dalam KUHPerdata.” Accessed September 16, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/simak-tafsir-mk-terhadap-ketentuan-pengampuan-dalam-kuhperdata-lt64c9ec68cd8c8/.

HM. Zainuddin. “Islam dan Masalah Kesehatan Jiwa.” Accessed August 30, 2024. https://uin-malang.ac.id/r/200501/islam-dan-masalah-kesehatan-jiwa.html.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 93/PUU-XX/2022. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, December 13, 2022. Accessed September 6, 2024. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/risalah/8867_Risalah-pdf_PERKARA_NOMOR_93.PUU-XX.2022_tgl._13_Desember_2022.pdf.

M. Fahmi and Hamidullah. “Wewenang dan Pendelegasian dalam Perspektif Al-Quran.” Al-Misykah: Jurnal Kajian Al-Quran dan Tafsir 2, no. 2 (2023): 6. https://doi.org/10.19109/almisykah.v4i2.20227.

Marta Mei Siska G. et al. “Pengelolaan Harta Kekayaan Orang di Bawah Pengampuan Oleh Balai Harta Peninggalan Kota Medan.” Fiat Justitia: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (March 2022): 208. https://doi.org/10.54367/fiat.v2i2.1768.

Nasrun Haroen. Fiqh Muamalah. Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama, 2007.

Nur Asiah. “Maslahah Menurut Konsep Imam Al-Ghazali.” DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum 18, no. 1 (2020): 123. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v18i1.

Nur Paikah. Sosiologi Hukum. Bone: CV Cendekiawan Indonesia Timur, 2023.

Piagam Madinah. Accessed September 30, 2024. http://repository.umy.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/22222/l.%20Lampiran.pdf?sequence=11.

Riri Mela Lomika Siregar. Curatele (Pengampuan): Suatu Analisis Atas Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 94/Pdt.P/2008, PN.Jkt.Sel dan Nomor 100/Pdt.P/2008/PN.Jkt.Sel. Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2009.

Aswin Junaedi Siregar. “Pengadilan Agama Panyabungan Hadiri Sosialisasi Tugas dan Fungsi Balai Harta Peninggalan Sekaligus Penandatanganan Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU).” Accessed September 12, 2024. https://pa-panyabungan.go.id/id/publikasi/arsipberita/962-pengadilan-agama-panyabungan-hadiri-sosialisasi-tugas-dan-fungsi-balai-hartapeninggalan-sekaligus-penandatanganan-memorandum-of-understanding-mou.

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Lembaran Negara Tahun 2011 Nomor 82 Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5234.

Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2014 tentang Kesehatan Jiwa. Data diperoleh dari direktori putusan Mahkamah Agung.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 69 Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5871.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas.

Qanun Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Lembaran Daerah Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tambahan Lembaran Daerah Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Nomor 21.

Qanun Nomor 10 Tahun 2007 tentang Baitul Mal. Lembaran Daerah Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Nomor 10 Tambahan Lembaran Daerah Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Nomor 10.

Mental Health Act 1983.

The Mental Health Ordinance 2001.