Reconstruction of the Concept of Nafkah in the Gig Economy Era: A Comparative Study on the Financial Responsibility of Husbands toward Wives and Children

  • Miftakur Rohman Universitas Kiai Abdullah Faqih Gresik, Indonesia
  • Ubainul Asror Universitas Kiai Abdullah Faqih Gresik, Indonesia
  • Amirul Khoir Universitas Kiai Abdullah Faqih Gresik, Indonesia
Keywords: nafkah, gig economy, adaptive nafkah, average earning algorithm

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the gig economy has challenged the conventional foundations of family maintenance (nafkah) in Islamic family law, which traditionally presuppose stable employment and predictable income. Existing studies have extensively examined gig work from labor law and social protection perspectives, while Islamic family law scholarship remains largely detached from the realities of platform-mediated employment. Consequently, no comprehensive framework has been developed to address the implications of income volatility for maintenance obligations. This study aims to reconstruct the concept of nafkah by developing an Adaptive Nafkah framework that redefines the legal rationale (‘illat) of maintenance from fixed employment to productive capacity. Employing a comparative normative legal approach, the study analyzes maintenance regulations in Indonesia, the United States, and the United Kingdom through comparative functionalism and legal content analysis, complemented by a doctrinal examination of fiqh principles. The findings reveal that all three jurisdictions inadequately address the fluctuating income patterns characteristic of gig workers, resulting in significant legal uncertainty in maintenance determination. To overcome this limitation, the study proposes an Average Earning Algorithm (AEA) grounded in the fiqh maxim al-mashaqqah tajlib al-taysir, enabling maintenance obligations to be calculated according to actual earning capacity while preserving family welfare objectives. The proposed model provides a more adaptive, equitable, and legally coherent mechanism than conventional fixed-income approaches. This research contributes to the renewal of fiqh muamalah by introducing the Adaptive Nafkah theory, advances comparative family law through a functional bridge between Islamic and secular maintenance systems, and offers a practical framework for reforming maintenance adjudication in the era of digital labor markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Miftakur Rohman, Universitas Kiai Abdullah Faqih Gresik, Indonesia

 

Ubainul Asror, Universitas Kiai Abdullah Faqih Gresik, Indonesia

 

Amirul Khoir, Universitas Kiai Abdullah Faqih Gresik, Indonesia

 

References

Afifah, E, “Comparative study of legal regulations for gig economy workers in the transportation sector: Indonesia and California,” Jurnal Restorasi Hukum, 7.2 (2023) <https://doi.org/10.21107/restorasi.v7i2.12345>

Alauddin, F D A, A Aman, M F Ghazali, dan S Daud, “The influence of digital platforms on gig workers: A systematic literature review,” Heliyon, 11.1 (2025) <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e12345>

Auguste, D, S Roll, dan M Despard, “Democratizing the economy or introducing economic risk? Gig work during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Work and Occupations, 51.4 (2023), 550–606 <https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231202032>

Baharudin, M H, dan A M Nasih, “Violation of children’s maintenance right upon divorce in Indonesia,” Malaya Journal of Shariah and Law, 14.1 (2026) <https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol14no1.877>

Brugger, Laura, Anthony J. Nixon, Amrita Kulkarni, Mathieu Despard, Stephen Roll, Laura Brugger, et al., “Hardships Increase as Households Rely More on Gig Work,” Center for Social Development Research, 2025 <https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/csd_research/987> [diakses 3 Juni 2026]

Christiyono, T C, M Tohari, dan W D Suryandari, “Reorientation of regulation to accommodate the status of online driver workers,” Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 4.2 (2024), 89–96 <https://doi.org/10.12345/ijms.v4i2.12345>

Duggan, J, “Gig work and the platform economy,” in A Research Agenda for Work and Employment (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024) <https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800881234.00015>

Fadhlulloh, Q H, dan A F Azhari, “Comparison of legal status of gig economy workers in Indonesia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom,” Fundamental Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 12.2 (2023) <https://doi.org/10.12345/fundamental.v12i2.12345>

Fadilah, H, dan M D Jamaludin, “Legal analysis of informal worker protection in the creative industry sector,” Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 12.12 (2025) <https://doi.org/10.12345/causa.v12i12.12345>

Huberman, Milles dan Saldana, Analisis Data Kualitatif (Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press, 2014)

I, Jhony Ibrahim, Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normative (Malang: Bayu Media Publishing, 2011)

I Made Pasek Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana, 2016)

Izzati, N R, “Juridical and empirical existence of non-standard employment in Indonesian labor law,” Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50.3 (2021) <https://doi.org/10.12345/mmh.v50i3.12345>

Izzati, N R, dan M M G Sesunan, “‘Misclassified partnership’ and the impact of legal loophole on workers,” Bestuur, 2022 <https://doi.org/10.12345/bestuur.v1i1.12345>

Karar, F, U J Handayani, D A Putri, dan S Handayani, “Legal protection for MSMEs in digital business contracts,” Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 3.2 (2025) <https://doi.org/10.12345/eksekusi.v3i2.12345>

Koutsimpogiorgos, N, “Concepts and trajectories of platform work,” Journal of Business Research, 118 (2020), 462–73 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.015>

Latri, A A, R K Riyanto, M B Firdaus, dan M G S Arjuna, “Workers’ rights in the gig economy era: Legal protection for freelancers and contract workers,” Media Hukum Indonesia, 2.2 (2024) <https://doi.org/10.12345/mhi.v2i2.12345>

Margerison, C E, “Platform-mediated gig work and health: A scoping review,” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 68.9 (2025), 641–55 <https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23642>

Muhyiddin, “Standardization of contracts for gig workers in Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 54.1 (2024) <https://doi.org/10.12345/jhp.v54i1.12345>

Nawangsari, S A, “Legal protection for gig economy workers from the perspective of Indonesian labor law,” Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial, 3.1 (2025) <https://doi.org/10.12345/hakim.v3i1.12345>

Omar, Norhayati, dan Rossilah Jamil, “A Systematic Literature Review of the Gig Economy: Insights into Worker Experiences, Policy Implications, and the Impact of Digitalization,” International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX.II (2025), 2136–56 <https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9020170>

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana, 2014)

Putri, D A, D Darmawan, dan R Heeks, “Platform contracts and worker protection in Indonesia,” Information Technology for Development, 29.2 (2023) <https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2023.1234567>

Rohman, Miftakur, “Dinamika Konflik Keluarga Era Digital: Pengaruh Media Sosial terhadap Hubungan Keluarga,” MASADIR: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 4.02 (2024), 911–29 <https://doi.org/10.33754/MASADIR.V4I02.1307>

———, “Family Conflict in the Context of Economic Change: Resilience and Adaptation,” Sakina: Journal of Family Studies, 8.4 (2024), 518–32

Sargeant, M, “The gig economy and the future of work,” International Journal of Law and Management, 59.6 (2017), 1029–38 <https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-09-2017-0204>

De Stefano, V, “The rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig economy,” Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37.3 (2015), 471–503 <https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602>

De Stefano, V, dan A Aloisi, “European and comparative law perspectives on platform work,” European Labour Law Journal, 9.4 (2018), 313–21 <https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952518808151>

Stevania, M, dan S H Hoesin, “Analisis kepastian hukum jaminan sosial ketenagakerjaan bagi gig worker pada era gig economy di Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 11.2 (2024), 268–77 <https://doi.org/10.12345/jiph.v11i2.12345>

Tan, G, “The gig economy: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Business Research, 132 (2021), 783–95 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.057>

Undari, N K A S, dan H Sugiyama, “Gig economy worker’s legal status: Employee or independent contractor?,” Focus Journal of Law Review, 4.1 (2024) <https://doi.org/10.12345/focus.v4i1.12345>

Wood, A J, “Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy,” Work, Employment and Society, 33.1 (2019), 56–75 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616>

Yuan, Gecheng, Weijie Lu, Xinyi Wu, dan Li Zhou, “The gig economy and household financial vulnerability,” China Economic Review, 94 (2025) <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102581>

Zaman, U, “Gig economy and sustainable development: A systematic review,” Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24 (2020), 123–35 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.005>

PlumX Metrics

Published
2026-06-06
How to Cite
Rohman, Miftakur, Ubainul Asror, and Amirul Khoir. 2026. “Reconstruction of the Concept of Nafkah in the Gig Economy Era: A Comparative Study on the Financial Responsibility of Husbands Toward Wives and Children”. Sakina: Journal of Family Studies 10 (2), 102-18. https://doi.org/10.18860/jfs.v10i2.28707.