Penerapan, kelebihan, dan kelemahan metode pembelajaran pai: ceramah, tanya jawab, ibrah mauidzah, drill, hafalan, demonstrasi, karyawisata, resitasi

  • Firman Ashar Ramadani UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Abstract

Islamic Religious Education (PAI) plays an important role in developing students’ cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects. The success of the learning process is largely determined by the selection and implementation of appropriate teaching methods by educators. This paper aims to examine the application, strengths, and weaknesses of various PAI teaching methods, including lecture, question-and-answer, ibrah mauidzah, drill, memorization, demonstration, field trips, and recitation. The study employs a library research method with a descriptive qualitative approach. The findings indicate that each method has its own characteristics, advantages, and limitations. The lecture method is effective for delivering material systematically, while the question-and-answer method enhances interaction and student participation. The ibrah mauidzah method contributes to character building, whereas drill and memorization strengthen memory retention. The demonstration method provides direct learning experiences involving psychomotor aspects, while field trips and recitation support contextual learning and student independence. There is no single method that is universally applicable; therefore, teachers are required to combine various methods creatively and innovatively in accordance with students’ characteristics and learning objectives. Thus, PAI learning is expected to become more effective, engaging, and meaningful.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Damanik, M. Z., and D. Yuliani. 2025. “Macam-Macam Metode Pembelajaran PAI Diikuti Kelebihan Dan Kekurangan.” At-Tarbiyah: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pendidikan Agama Islam 2(2):354–57.

Al Faruq, Umar. 2020. “Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Perguruan Tinggi Umum.” Contemplate: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Keislaman 1(2):107–20. https//:repository.uin-malang.ac.id/8774/1/8774.pdf.

Fauzi, A., and M. Rahman. 2023. “Analisis Kelemahan Dan Tantangan Metode Pembelajaran PAI Di Sekolah.” Jurnal Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan 7(2):120–28.

Hidayah, Nurul. 2021. “Strategi Pembelajaran PAI Dalam Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 6(1):45–58. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/10071/1/10071.pdf.

Hidayat, T., and S. Anwar. 2024. “Strategi Inovatif Dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pembelajaran PAI.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Modern 6(1):25–34.

Maulana, R., and D. Fitriani. 2023. “Pengembangan Kompetensi Guru PAI Dalam Pemilihan Metode Pembelajaran.” Jurnal Tarbiyah Nusantara 5(2):140–49.

Nurdiana, N., and A. Mukminin. 2025. “Efektivitas Metode Ceramah, Tanya Jawab, Diskusi Dalam Pembelajaran Fiqih Kelas 7 Pondok Pesantren Ar-Rayyan Wonogiri.” AlMaheer: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 3(01):1–8.

Prayogi, A., R. Nasrullah, B. K. Mutaqin, and M. Syaifuddin. 2025. “Relevansi Penerapan Metode Ceramah plus Dalam Pembelajaran PAI Di Era Digital.” ALMUSTOFA: Journal of Islamic Studies and Research 1(2):33–39.

Rahmawati, I., and A. Sulaiman. 2025. “Integrasi Teknologi Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Islam 4(2):88–96.

Siregar, R., and N. Harahap. 2024. “Problematika Penggunaan Metode Pembelajaran Dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer 5(1):45–53.

Sutiah. 2018. “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Repository UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang 1–15. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/6043/1/6043.pdf.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2026-05-04
How to Cite
Ramadani, F. (2026). Penerapan, kelebihan, dan kelemahan metode pembelajaran pai: ceramah, tanya jawab, ibrah mauidzah, drill, hafalan, demonstrasi, karyawisata, resitasi. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(6), 216-223. Retrieved from https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/25726
Section
Articles