THE IMPACT OF GROUP-TO-GROUP EXCHANGE (GGE) METHOD IN GRAMMAR LEARNING

  • Ade Nauval Alamsyah Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Banyuwangi
Keywords: group to group exchange, cooperative learning, EFL, active learning, grammar proficiency

Abstract

This study rigorously examines the pedagogical efficacy of the Group-to-Group Exchange (GGE) method in enhancing grammar acquisition among a cohort of twenty-eightth-grade students at a junior high school in Banyuwangi, Indonesia. Employing a concurrent mixed-methods design, quantitative data were gathered via standardized classroom observations—measuring Johnson andJohnson’s five cooperative-learning elements—and pre- and post-test grammar assessmentsdeveloped from the official school syllabus and cross-checked against CEFR rubrics by subjectteachers. Qualitative insights were derived from semi-structured interviews with both students andtheir instructors. Over an eight-week intervention, observation scores averaged 4.20 on a 5-point Likert scale (promotive interaction M = 4.50; social skills M = 4.25), indicating high levels ofcollaborative engagement. Paired-sample t-tests revealed a statistically significant improvement in grammar proficiency (pre-test M = 50.50 vs. post-test M = 69.25; Δ = +18.75, SD = 7.76, t(19) = –10.81, p < .001), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d ≈ 2.41). Interview themes highlightedincreased motivation, peer-supported scaffolding, and positive shifts in classroom dynamics, alongside challenges such as passive participation and vocabulary constraints. Triangulation ofthese data sources confirms that GGE not only promotes syntactic mastery but also cultivatesmetacognitive awareness and learner autonomy. The findings advocate for the strategic integrationof GGE within EFL curricula, recommending structured cross-group rotations, facilitator training, and targeted vocabulary supports to optimize cooperative grammar instruction in contexts similarto Indonesian secondary schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Longman.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Donato, R., & Brooks, F. B. (2015). Vygotskian approaches to SLA: Mediated learning and collaborative interaction. In J. F. Lee (Ed.), Second Language Interaction in Diverse Educational Contexts (pp. 45–67). Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40264512
https://voi.id/en/news/ (EF EPI Research, English Proficiency In Indonesia Is Still Low)
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2017). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (4th ed.). Routledge.
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1998). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1017–1044). Macmillan.
Khan, N., & Akhtar, S. (2017). Peer interaction tasks and EFL learners’ self-efficacy. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(4), 453–467.
Larsen‐Freeman, D. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Markina, A., & Molla, T. (2022). Teacher-centered vs. student-centered approaches: A comparative study. Journal of Educational Studies, 14(2), 112–128.
Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2018). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge.
Odehova, N., Petrova, M., & Ivanov, K. (2022). Structured triadic peer feedback in EFL contexts. Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 23–39.
Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189–1208.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
Putri, A. (2023). Implementing Grammar Grouping Exercise (GGE) in junior high EFL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 78–89.
Sarwono, D. (2018). Cross-group feedback and written error reduction. Journal of Language Teaching, 9(2), 55–67.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zarifi, N., & Taghavi, F. (2016). Cooperative learning interventions and grammar accuracy among Iranian EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 50(3), 610–625.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2025-11-27